Editor:

The Medina Central School district is considering the option to offer veterans a discount on their school tax, which I believe is a good idea that would benefit the vets greatly.

However, I wonder if veterans would actually take this discount knowing that it raises taxes on their neighbors, including some vets that are ineligible for this discount. Everyone can agree veterans deserve thanks and praise for their service regardless of how and when they served.

If there is a policy in place that benefits someone who is in need, they should apply for it. A reduction in taxes is always beneficial, but not necessarily at the cost of your neighbor or your community.

We are one of the poorest counties in the state, and a large percentage of the population is living paycheck to paycheck.

For myself I will be happy to pay the extra amount, as it is the least I can do to help veterans. However there are many in the neighborhood that would like to pay this but are just not financial able to.

The school board faces a tough choice, especially since there is not a wrong choice. If you are a veteran please make sure the school board knows how you feel.

Timothy Elliott
Medina resident and “military brat”

Editor:

I want to save Medina, so I’m voting to dissolve it. We’ve all seen figures like the 16 percent decline in village property values versus 4 percent out-of-village or how much per-thousand we will save or lose, but in the end, here are the objections I had to overcome in my own mind:

Do I want to raise my neighbors’ taxes in order to lower my own?

No. But I don’t want to continue subsidizing their water/sewer and emergency services, either. They get services I pay for. I pay for other services I don’t get at all. So, I feel for them, but I don’t feel sorry any more than they feel bad about my water bill. It’s no fun feeling like you’re giving someone else a free ride.

Do I want my history and sense of identity to go away?

No. But, then again, my sense of Medina is not tied to political fictions like “village” and “town.” What’s in a name anyway? If it was the Town of Medina with a district called Medina within it, I would still have been born and raised here, I would continue to live here and raise my kids here. I will still have Mustang Pride.

Do I want my emergency services to go away?

No. But we already pay double tax and there are ways to keep most if not all of our current level of public works and safety with cooperation. That last word being pretty hard to come by.

Do I believe the state incentives will last forever?

No. But they have been available for the past four years that we’ve spun our wheels thinking about it and missing out on. And if/when they decide to cut the program, the people who will be cut out first are those that aren’t currently taking advantage. In other words, the ship will have sailed at some point.

What about becoming a City?

No new charters have been issued since the ’40s. We are free to petition for a City charter, but the county will take a hit and the association of counties will lobby against it. Plus, from Albany’s point of view, they have solved this problem when they created the Local Government Efficiency Program and associated grants and incentives. I’m a populist at heart, but I know the tail rarely wags the dog.

Don’t I want the Towns and Village to cooperate on consolidation?

Yes. But they haven’t and likely won’t.

Aren’t I afraid the Towns won’t cooperate after dissolution?

I know they won’t. They haven’t to date, and have plainly stated they will not follow the plan. They had to be forced into the conversation like this, if only to fight it, you can bet they will get back out of it the second they can.

Which leads me to what made my ultimate decision. For three years I’ve heard about this possibility. For three years, it has devolved into a schoolyard slap fight.

One side has had a third party evaluate the feasibility, created a plan and invited others to participate. They did their homework. The other side hired a PR firm to shill for them.

They and this firm have deleted Facebook posts, banned users and sent fliers, written editorials and mailed postcards filled with fear, uncertainty and doubt. Full of lies like “there won’t be any more Ale in Autumn” that demonstrate either their willingness to say anything to protect the status quo or how out-of-touch they actually are with what goes on in the Village.

I’ve got a well made, laminated flier in front of me without a single “quote” from someone not on the Town payroll. It has become obvious whose best interests they represent. They have presented anti-dissolution rhetoric.

They’re against it. I get that. But what are they for? Nothing, apparently. No change to the status quo is entertained, no alternative plan is offered.

So, I will vote YES on the 20th. And I will vote YES on consolidation in the next phase. And if I don’t see some level of maturity, productivity and transparency from the Towns, I will be voting against incumbents come election time. If a vote of “no confidence” can be forced before the next election, I will vote for that.

If you disagree with me, don’t bother trying to change my mind. Call your town supervisor and try to change theirs. They work for us. Just remember: Any new idea will be faced with fierce opposition by people with too much at stake in the current regime.

Roots in the past, eyes on the future.

Jeremy Hogan
Medina resident, business owner and concerned citizen

Editor:

As part of the ongoing discussion regarding the proposed dissolution of the Village of Medina, we as the East Shelby Volunteer Fire Company would like to express our position against dissolving the village government.

Our fire company has been in service since 1953, and we are strongly opposed to the dissolution. We have the privilege of working side by side with the village fire, ambulance and police departments. This has always been a professional and respectful working relationship that has met the needs of the community.

If the dissolution occurs, we may never have again an ambulance service with the ability to put four ambulances on the road at the same time when called upon to provide for the needs of our citizens.

Throughout our 62-year history working closely with the Medina Fire Department at fire calls and emergencies, we have experienced a hand-in-hand partnership between the paid firemen in the village and the volunteer firemen and women in East Shelby, which provides the highest quality service possible for our communities.

Sincerely,

Members of the East Shelby Volunteer Fire Company

Fire Chief Michael O. Fuller
President Dennis W. MacDonald

Editor:

So Mr. Rivers does not have to add a disclaimer at the end of my letter, I am a Village of Medina Trustee.

That being said, for those of you who are unaware, I am against dissolution – both for personal reasons and what I am hearing from the majority of the residents I have spoken to as well as the response at the public hearing on the dissolution plan.

We have all seen the mailers, read the articles in the paper and on-line, and hopefully listened to the debate on Orleans Radio. Each registered voter in the village must ask themselves three important questions. After you answer these questions with thought and truthfulness, I believe you will understand why dissolution is not the solution.

1. Do I want the enhanced services to continue that I receive living in the village? (Career Fire/Ambulance Department, Police Department, Department of Public Works)

2. Do I want the same service inside the village as the towns receive outside the village?

3. Can I afford less than a dollar a day to keep the Village of Medina as it is now? (anticipated savings per the plan)

Our fire and police departments have a 3-minute or less response time for 911 calls. Our DPW clears our streets and sidewalks in the winter, repairs streets, water and sewer lines, pick up brush in the spring and leaves in the fall along with numerous other jobs to maintain the village as we know it.

The village and two towns have and do participate in shared services and purchases. I believe more savings can be realized with more shared services and inner-municipal agreements. I am personally working on renegotiating the ambulance contract between the village and the Towns of Shelby, Ridgeway, and Yates. These meetings have opened meaningful dialogue between myself and the town’s supervisors.

We need to look at all purchases that are made by the village departments. We have to investigate if we are using the NYS contracts as they are intended to be used to lower taxes.

Remember you are voting to dissolve the Village of Medina, not on the plan that was presented. There is a large unknown factor what would happen and what the tax rate would be or the services provided if the village is dissolved. Dissolution is not the solution.

Please vote “NO” for dissolution on Jan. 20.

Michael Sidari
Medina

Editor:

As many of us have been, we too have closely followed the ongoing debate regarding dissolution. We are not opposed to shared services and or consolidation if it is done properly. This upcoming vote is neither. It is not a vote to create “One Medina.” It is an elimination vote that would cause there to be no Medina!

We are not the Village of Seneca Falls that was located entirely within a township of the SAME name and could seamlessly consolidate with that township. Medina being split between two townships extremely complicates all aspects of this dissolution! This fact is being greatly overlooked.

There have been a lot of numbers thrown around and “promised” savings. If the savings are so great and the numbers are so accurate, why would CGR (Center for Governmental Research), the agency that conducted the feasibility study, recommend NOT dissolving the Village without merger of the towns?

Everyone keeps asking for better ideas. Here is one, petition for a consolidation vote of Ridgeway and Shelby. This should be the FIRST step in the process! Let all constituents who this affects have a say in the matter to determine if everyone truly wants One Medina.

To ask village voters to decide if they should dissolve Medina without having the knowledge of what the townships will do is irresponsible and frankly unfair to both village and town residents. Creating districts and LDCs (Local Development Corporation) that will all have taxing authority would make more government layers with voters having less voice. It would just put an invisible line on the map of what was the former village. If you are going to do this, you might as well keep the village.

The village is the biggest entity with the equipment, personnel, and infrastructure already in place. Why would you just throw that away and hope the towns could pick up the pieces, reinvent the wheel, and effectively provide these vital services.
Forcing this on two unwilling townships is not the answer! Medina would forever be the black sheep of the towns. This is not a test that we can try for a few years and then go back if we don’t like it.

This vote is final, and it would be a mistake that this area would spend decades trying to recover from. Vote NO on Jan. 20, and let’s start working with the towns instead of against them!

Respectfully submitted,

Don and Nancy Draper
57 years of combined service to the Village of Medina

(Mr. Draper is a retired Medina police chief and Mrs. Draper is a retired village court clerk.)

Editor:

Medina is headed for crisis. With the highest tax rates in the region, a declining population, a shrinking tax base, boarded-up homes and rising costs, things cannot stay the way they are.

Unless we do something now, maintaining our current level of services is going to become more and more difficult, if not impossible, and our beautiful village is going to sink more and more into decline.

Dissolution offers a chance to modernize, streamline and move local government into the 21st century. Medina’s plan will reorganize local government from three layers to one, while reducing sky-high taxes that cripple our local economy.

The unfairness of our current tax structure is obvious and troubling . My town tax bill just came in the mail. This month, I’ll be sending a check for hundreds of dollars to a government that does virtually nothing for me. The two town governments take over $1,000,000 from me and 6,000 other village residents and spend it on services that we never see. We end up subsidizing over 30 percent of the town budgets. No wonder taxes outside the village are lower.

Our town leaders haven’t done a thing to help. The article in the Democrat and Chronicle on Sunday proved to me that they will sit comfortably on their hands for years – in some cases, decades – with the hopes that nothing will ever change.

It also proved that regardless of the vote outcome, we need new leaders to lay the groundwork for the future. I understand the concern of village employees. Our local firefighters, police officers and Department of Public Works employees do a great job. No one is denying that. However, benefit costs will continue to skyrocket, workers will want raises, equipment costs will mount, and all the while, residents will demand that roads be repaired and streets be plowed.

But with everything else shrinking, how long can we keep this up? Our multi-tiered, antiquated system of government must change. If we don’t change, budgets and services are going to have to be cut or taxes are going to have to be increased in an area that is already being choked by high taxes.

Dissolution opponents offer only fear of lost services, identity, and, absurdly, our local history as an alternative. It is very easy to get stuck in the past even if it is not the best choice. One of my favorite Beach Boys songs from the 60s is “Wouldn’t it be Nice.” Indeed it would.

A Medina with three hardware stores, three men’s and women’s clothing stores, a strong industrial base with foundries and furniture factories was really nice when we had it.

But we cannot run a government on nostalgia. We cannot remain in the past. We must change. Our school district has made difficult, sometimes contentious choices to reorganize and streamline their operations. Many organizations have.

But in almost every case, they emerge as stronger, more viable institutions equipped to face the future. It is time for our village to do the same.

Dissolution offers solutions. It is not an overnight process. It will take several years to implement and a great deal of work on the part of our local leaders. But it is the best hope for the future of the village and the towns.

Vote yes for a brighter future for Medina.

Ed Weider
Medina

Editor:

The residents of Medina have a choice coming up on Jan. 20.

The choice is “Do I vote yes to support dissolution and possibly save money in my yearly taxes?” or “Do I vote no to preserve the community that I have lived in for years or recently relocated to live here?” I say vote no.

Voting to dissolve the Village of Medina that was incorporated in 1832 is not the solution.

Medina is very unique in the fact that we have a fully staffed fired department that utilized its members as Emergency Medical Technicians for the most basic EMT right up to Advanced Life Support as a paramedic. The men are dedicated and have provided a service that just last year brought in a little over 1 million dollars.

Previously this service was provided by a commercial ambulance service that had one unit here for 911 calls in the village, as well as the towns of Ridgeway, Shelby, Yates and the Village of Lyndonville. Medina Fire Department provided the backup service when the commercial unit was out of service.

With dissolution there are no guarantees that the current level of service now provided will remain the same. Fire service is a brotherhood and even though Medina fire is staffed with firefighters around the clock, we still need the assistance of our volunteer brothers to work a structure fire, just as we help them in their respective response areas.

Medina also has a staffed Police Department that answers calls to its residents in a timely matter. Outside of the village you have the Orleans County Sheriff’s Department along with the New York State Police to answer county calls. With dissolution you lose the current comfort of knowing a police officer or two will respond within mere minutes.

Our Department of Public Works runs and maintains the village streets, water, and sewer. To maintain the same level of service for this, taxes will not go down to keep the streets cleared in the winter and maintained in the summer.

Water is not guaranteed and to this point no one can answer let alone guarantee that the contract with the Niagara County Water Authority and the Village of Medina will be maintained. Local laws, village planning and zoning laws go away and will need to be brought to Town of Shelby and Ridgeway Zoning and Planning.

My point in all this is look into the promises being made about tax reductions with no loss of current services. Ask questions and become informed about what the true impact of dissolution will be, because frankly I think you will be surprised as to what you might lose and what is being promised.

Sincerely,

Michael G. Maak
Medina

(Mr. Maak is a Medina firefighter.)

Editor:

I was born and raised in Medina. I am totally against the dissolution of Village of Medina. Rather than split the Village of Medina in two, eliminate our heritage and give up local control of our government, it would be better to simply to look for ways to improve efficiency in our village and towns.

There may be instances where town and village can share equipment or work out joint purchasing agreements.

Instead of offering multiple insurance policies there may be a cost effective group policies that could be offered in order to receive better rates.

I believe there are ways to cut costs without dissolving the village.

Sincerely,

Jennifer L. Hazel
Albion

Editor:

As we get closer to Jan 20, we as village residents have a very important decision to make. Do we vote yes to dissolve our village or do we vote no and keep our village intact as it has been for over 175 years?

Before I offer my opinion I will state first, yes I am a village employee and have been for the past 21 years. Some will read this and say I’m only trying to protect our jobs, and that’s fine. I understand there are strong feelings on both sides of this subject.

For those who know me they know my parents raised me not to be an alarmist but a realist and my opinion is based on over 29 years in the emergency services field.

For over two years much time and effort has been put into exploring the possible dissolution of our village. Many people have spent countless hours in meetings putting together two different studies to present the information to our residents. I personally know that several of these people are highly respected and qualified professionals in our community.

First, I want to go on record and say, as the fire chief I was included in the informational gathering process of both studies.With that being said, very little time was spent with me by members of CGR regarding the fire department on either study. I was involved with face-to-face meetings, lasting 45 minutes and and an hour, respectively, along with a few emails.

I guess they felt they had enough information to make recommendations for the future of our department based on those interactions alone, knowing that we respond to 3,000 calls a year, have 13 full-time employees, 2 temporary full-time, and over 20 call firefighters. Not to mention a budget of around $1.3 million and revenue of well over a million dollars a year for the Village of Medina.

The second study, when completed, produced a list of recommendations that if
the village dissolves, the towns will have the choice to follow or chose not to. I can compare this list to the one I used to make for Santa when I was a little boy…. A wish list!!

My mother would tell me I was a good child throughout the year, but Santa never brought me everything on my list. Some years I got one thing, some none, but never did I receive everything. Are we willing to dissolve the village hoping we will be granted everything on One Medina’s wish list. The towns have already gone on record stating they are not planning on following the recommendation.

As an example I would like to reference another study that our Village Board commissioned back in 2006 – an ambulance feasibility study. The Medina Fire Department wanted to take over primary ambulance service in Western Orleans County. The study stated it would take 17 full-time firefighters to accommodate roughly 1,500 to 1,700 calls per year.

As you can see from the demographics of our department as stated above, we do not have close to the staffing levels recommended by this study and respond to double the amount of calls. I tell you this not to complain about our manpower. Only to make a point that a study does not need to be adhered to by leaders. A study is just that, with no obligation to follow.

Comments have been made on social media that state, if we don’t dissolve the village there is no guarantee that we can maintain our current services as they are today. That statement stands true every year, for any municipality no matter how small a town or how big a city.

I have been a department head since 2003. Each budget year we have to work diligently to maintain costs as we move forward to the next. There are some costs that are beyond our control. There have been years that we have had to cut into our equipment budget to keep costs at a respectable rate and still provide the level of service our community deserves. I can not say that taxes will not go up from year to year, but I will say if the village does not dissolve we will continue to work hard to keep your services intact.

I do not fear change. Change is good if it provides a clear and positive path to follow. If the village dissolves, there is no clear path. We do not know how it will affect your emergency services. I can only speak for the Fire Department. Your Medina Fire Department as you know it today will not be the same, and in my opinion we have the best fire and ambulance protection here in the western side of Orleans County.

The Medina Fire Department is part of a wheel, “the hub” and the spokes are four excellent volunteer fire departments – East Shelby, Shelby, Ridgeway and Lyndonville. We all need each other’s help and if you take one part away from the wheel it will have a hard time spinning.

If a fire and ambulance district are not successful in being created as the studies suggest please know this, Shelby and Ridgeway Fire Departments will be asked to respond to calls inside their respective townships that were once the village. The increase in call volume alone for each department will be on average six times the amount of calls they respond to now. That alone will be very hard for an all-volunteer department to sustain.

It is a fact that fire doubles in size every minute. Shelby’s fire hall sits roughly 1.5 miles outside the village and Ridgeway is 3 miles away. Again these departments are excellent but the fact is it will take longer for trucks to arrive on scene inside the old village borders.

The Medina Fire Department maintains four ALS (Advanced Life Support) ambulances staffed by some of the best paramedics and EMTs WNY has to offer. One of the only options if the ambulance district isn’t created is to go back to a commercial ambulance service.

There is only one presently with a state-wide CON (Certificate of Need) which could set up shop quickly. It is the same company we had prior to 2007 which could not maintain the level of service our community needed even then. No commercial ambulance will maintain any more than one ambulance in our area with a possible floater during high-call volume times.

Another fact… We will be waiting longer times for an ambulance to get to an emergency. As I worked for three years in the Orleans 911 dispatch center before coming to work at the fire department, trust me I spent many times on the phone reassuring the caller on the other end that help was near when I knew help was still a long way away from them. In comparison, the Medina Fire Department was on scene within 3 minutes each time we were dispatched to an emergency inside of village, bringing help much sooner.

Here comes the realist in me… The guys at the fire department are concerned. These last two years have been the most stressful years of my career, trying to keep the guys focused on doing our job (which is adherently stressful enough) without the distraction of the possible dissolution.

If the Village dissolves I can predict that we will start losing some very good young firefighters almost immediately to other departments. These firefighters don’t want to leave the village they love but with young families to support they will leave for a more stable and secure future. I know they say we will have two years to make the transition but what isn’t being talked about is how do we maintain our level of service when we start losing valuable firefighters.

With uncertainty in the air there won’t be anyone knocking on our door knowing the future of our department is unknown. I can not possibly work these men any harder if we lose manpower. I refer again to the study above regarding staffing levels, they suggest one paid firefighter for every 100 calls per year. We are currently at approximately 200 calls per paid firefighter per year.

At some point, sooner than later, tough decisions will have to be made if we feel our level of services can not be maintained to our standards or that the Village of Medina residents have become accustomed too.

On Jan. 20, we as village residents will be faced with in my opinion one of the most important votes of our lifetime. I know in a lot of elections we all ask ourselves: “Does our vote really count?” Trust me, it does. Before you vote, please educate yourself as much as possible with the facts and then ask yourself, what level of service am I and my family willing to live with or live without?

There are a lot of different figures being tossed out there about what will we save if we dissolve. I know personally as I figured out my supposed savings, if I go by the savings calculator on the One Medina’s website. It equates to one and a half months of my cell phone bill or going out to dinner less than one time a month for a year. I’m willing to give up both for life if it means having a police car, a fire truck or an ambulance at my front door within 3 minutes of calling.

We all have a choice. I choose to live in the village for the services they provide and I’m willing to pay for that. The residents in the towns of Shelby and Ridgeway have also chosen where they want to live. The Village of Medina residents should not be the only ones allowed to vote on decisions that will impact the towns.

If the village dissolves and services are lost, there is no going back to the way it was. If you have faith in your leaders and department heads then give us a chance to continue to provide the services we have been in our community for the past 175 years. I love the Village of Medina and surrounding area. I was raised here, went to school here and started a family here. If I work here another 15 years or retire tomorrow, I will always be proud to tell people the Village of Medina is my home.

On Jan. 21, after the vote is done, no matter the outcome, will life still go on … absolutely. We will still go to bed at the same time, wake up, kiss our family goodbye, grab our coffee and head to work. If the village dissolves, the blanket of security that we cover ourselves with each night as we close our eyes will undoubtedly be thinner.

Please remember, as the saying goes: You don’t know what you’ve got until it’s gone.

Respectively,

Todd Zinkievich
Proud Fire Chief of the Village of Medina Fire Department

Editor:

Tom Rivers had a wonderful editorial in the Hub on Jan. 5 titled “Here’s a resolution that every elected official in Orleans should support.” It’s about the disproportionate amounts of state aid that villages and municipalities receive as compared to the amounts that cities receive, regardless of population.

As the Village of Medina’s decision on whether to dissolve looms, I can’t help but wonder why more village governments aren’t pushing for fair funding to turn themselves around rather than to just dissolve and hope that the state money which has been “promised” to encourage dissolution is renewed year to year. While the latter solution may save the average village taxpayer enough money each month to splurge on a large pizza and an order of wings (projected $40 a month savings for the average village household and at the expense on an increased tax rate for town residents), will it do much more than this?

The former solution would surely allow our villages across the state, with the right leadership, to thrive and even grow; it could permanently bring the money needed to draw in industry and technology, to fill our Main Street shops, to grow our tourism dollars, to preserve our historical sites, and to fund arts and cultural programs.

I hope that Medina’s residents show up to the polls in overwhelming numbers to vote on the 20th. I hope that whoever is in leadership of Medina in the weeks and years following the vote, whether a village mayor or town supervisor(s), can think bigger than just tax savings and truly work to enrich the village or former village.

Most of all I hope voters recognize all that is at stake for our village before they cast their vote and that they are aware of ALL of the possible ways, with willing leadership, that we can work for a revitalized and prosperous community.

Respectfully,

Julia Goheen
Medina

Editor:

Personally I find it unseemly and perhaps counterproductive for village employees to enter the debate about dissolution of the Village of Medina. No matter what their true motives are, people will assume that they are doing it for fear of losing their jobs.

That said, I too worry very much about them losing their jobs. The dissolution plan sounds good and might make sense if the two towns were willing to have anything to do with it, but why should they? They have always looked after the interests of those constituents outside of the village rather than those in the village. That is not going to change. So let’s be realistic.

Without the cooperation of the two towns there are two possible outcomes from dissolution. The first will be losing village services and hoping that the towns will be willing to take up the slack but why should they? That would force them to raise taxes on those outside of the village.

The second outcome would be that the former village residents will have to pay extra taxes to cover the cost of keeping those services and of course the costs of an agency to oversee those services.

I guess that the good news is that with the dissolution of the village all contracts with village workers would become null and void. You can’t have a contract entered into by only one party. Whatever agency was overseeing the departments would be free to reduce hourly wages and tell the employees to take it or leave.

Over the years I have heard many complain about this department or that department and the quality of their work. I may have done that from time to time myself. But let’s think this through. If we are dissatisfied with the quality of the work of those earning, say, $40,000 a year will we be more satisfied with the quality of the work of those earning, say, $30,000 a year?

Dissolution might be a great way to break the unions but will it improve the quality of our lives? I wonder.

John S. Grimes
Medina

(Mr. Grimes is a former village trustee.)

Editor:

I have been thinking about the upcoming vote to dissolve the Village of Medina, and I must admit that I have never liked this idea or the idea of consolidating governments. I believe this takes away personal pride for his or her own community.

I have been involved in emergency services for 55 years, and this is my concern: if the village dissolved, what will happen to the fire, ambulance and police departments? Will they be gone or completely restructured? Whether they are gone or are restructured, how will this save money?

Right now you have one of the best ambulance services in the state, run by your fire department, with well-trained personnel for both fighting fires and providing ambulance services, all with fast response times.

Think about a community the size of Medina, without a police department, trying to cover a much larger area. Yes, it can be done, but NOT without the efficiency and expediency you now receive.

Wherever we live, we want to live our lives and raise our families where we feel safe knowing we have a strong fire, ambulance and police services. We have that now in Medina. Don’t let it go.

Sincerely,

David Green
Medina

(Green is the retired sheriff of Orleans County.)

Editor:

Dissolution or shared services?

First off, I will state that I signed the petition to put dissolution of the Village of Medina to a vote. Why would I do that, some might ask? Partly I have grown weary of the back and forth between the “Leaders.” It seemed for a moment shared services was on track to provide efficient government to all residents of the village, Town of Ridgeway and the Town of Shelby.

Somewhere the train went off the track. Accusations started flying quietly and publicly. Leaders need to be leaders and search for solutions – solutions that can benefit all of the people with as little pain as possible.

I say to those that live outside of the village, you do have a say. You must hold your town leaders accountable. If shared services happened, we probably would not come to a vote. I also say fear not, if dissolution is passed, it will take almost two years to implement a plan. If it goes down, we all have four years to work together for a shared services plan. If the current leaders don’t or won’t work together, we all have an opportunity to find new leaders that will work together.

I truly believe there are solutions, possibly not explored. Do I have the answers? No, but I am willing to discuss ideas for the benefit of all. Either way this goes, we as citizens need to communicate to our respective leaders with ideas not yet explored.

Will it be a 2-year plan or a 4-year plan? The village residents will decide on Jan. 20.

I have not decided yet and plan on listening up to the day of the vote.

Sincerely,

Wayne Litchfield
Village of Medina resident

Editor:

I’m from Medina Oh really? I have always said it that way when the subject comes up of where I’m from. “And where are you from?” Oh I’m from Medina, a little town halfway between Buffalo and Rochester.

Actually I’m not from Medina, own no property in the village, and do not live in the village. With the exception of renting an apartment at one time for about a year, I have never truly been from Medina. Maybe I need to change my explanation to truly reflect where I’m from when the subject comes up. I would not want to mislead anyone. I’m from the Town of Ridgeway. Hold that thought.

I read a story in the ‘Hub’ on Jan. 6 about a devastating fire that destroyed a milking parlor on a dairy farm owned by an Amish family on Fruit Avenue, Medina. The structure and its contents were a total loss.

A milking parlor can be likened to the heart of a dairy farm. Without it functioning properly, the dairy farm could not survive for very long. I felt so bad for this ambitious family as they recently moved to the area and have invested much in terms of time and other resources in their property.

About an hour after the firefighting equipment and personnel had left the area, I decided to drive by the property and witness the devastation. The pictures listed in ‘The Hub’ did accurately convey the image of destruction of this central part of the farm operation. What a mess, not to mention the fact that the cows needed to be milked again within just a few hours.

As I drove by this devastation I observed a happening rarely, if ever, seen in the “English” community. There was a group of Amish men clearing the burned out structure, in fact the site of the destroyed structure was virtually free of debris and readied to move forward. I’m sure this small army of helpers all had other important things to do that day, yet they dropped everything in their personal lives to give assistance with a goal of resolving a monumental issue.

It was then that it hit me, I mean really hit me. I relate this fire event to the current situation involving Medina, Ridgeway and Shelby. We can stand around and defend and protect our own separate entities or we can, like the group of helpers previously mentioned, come together to resolve a situation.

The Medina area can boast several examples of municipal success stories which have disregarded geographical and political boundaries and resulted in constructive cooperation.

The Medina Central School district consolidation from approximately 10 separate area school districts is a prime example. The Medina Memorial Hospital, The Sandstone Society, Hospice of Orleans and countless other civic ventures, all serve as examples of purposeful cooperative efforts by men and women with a vision for our community.

Our community has been and continues to be fortunate to have citizenry committed to looking beyond the status quo. Change and progress can be synonymous if driven by open minds and cooperative efforts on the part of those chosen to represent us.

The end result could be once again when asked, so where are you from? Oh, I’m proud to say I’m from Medina, you may not have heard of it. It’s a quaint community, located on the Erie Canal about halfway between Buffalo and Rochester, with a vision for its future.

Lee Blackburn
Fruit Avenue, Medina

Editor:

The members of the Medina Police Benevolent Association strongly encourage all registered village voters to vote on Jan. 20. This vote is NOT to combine the village and two townships into one entity or “One Medina,” but to dissolve the village.

Dissolving the village ends any agreement with the village and the Medina Police, ultimately resulting in ending police services for the village.

So what are we saying? Police services that you as the village taxpayer pay for are gone, including community policing, quick response times to calls, animal control, downtown business door checks, crossing guard, school resource officer, K-9 officer, officers’ knowledge of the community, 24/7 coverage, and many other services.

One Medina promoters have preached that there will be no loss of police services, everything will remain the same. The creation of a police force falls on the towns, who have publicly said they have no desire to create. The towns are satisfied with the sheriff and state police service.

As of a letter sent to the Medina-Ridgeway-Shelby Consolidation Feasibility Study Committee dated Jan. 27, 2011, the Orleans County Sheriff’s Office indicated that its department is NOT currently in a position NOR interested in providing services to the village and that the village is already well served by the Medina Police Department.

The Medina Police again strongly encourages the registered village voters to consider the level of police services they want. Please vote.

Members of the Medina Police Benevolent Association

Chad Kenward
Michael Borrell
Joseph Frentz
Steven Fox
Todd Draper
Greg Fraser
Mark Prawel
Mark Parker