Editor:

The American conservative believes that America is great because it is good; goodness, here, meaning its citizenry is comprised of people with high morals and ethics.

In arguing for a county-run nursing home, apparently, there are those who falsely claim to have conservative leanings whose very arguments reveal their true ideology. You can’t claim to be conservative and believe the government can do a better job at running a nursing home than can the private sector.

A conservative understands that government does not need to be efficient in its operations. If a private entity loses money it goes out of business. Therefore, as part of its mindset and operation it looks to improve efficiencies and leaves no stone unturned when generating income.

If a government entity loses money it either taxes more or blindly borrows from tomorrow’s children. It is interesting how the current Legislature is being blamed for not looking for more revenue by utilizing “unused” space to generate more income at the nursing home. My question would be, why is this not currently being done by the people paid to manage the nursing home?

A private sector enterprise would not have allowed “useable space” to be left unused; they can’t afford it; the government can afford not to use idle space, which is why we end up in this predicament.

A conservative understands people are thoughtful, kind and compassionate. Non-conservatives don’t think this way as their ideology believes somehow only people employed by the government can properly care for the sick or the elderly. Apparently they think if the private sector runs the nursing home, the same people currently taking care of the elderly now will become callous, cruel, and uncaring and let people starve and die.

A conservative understands it is in the private company’s best interest to provide superior care to the people generating the income. If they get a bad reputation people will choose to go elsewhere and the private company ends up out of business.

A conservative loves his mother and father and takes care of them when they no longer can take care of themselves, no matter how inconvenient it is to them. They understand that sacrifice and suffering, while not desired, is necessary for the humanity of mankind. Love is built upon this foundation.

Conservatives wonder why they are expected to love someone else’s parents more than those parent’s own children do when it comes to elder care. “Why should I love your parents more than you do?”

Conservatives are very generous. They understand the famous person who said, “The poor you will always have ” They feel a responsibility to set aside some of their provisions to share with those in need. They know that when government becomes the middleman in helping the poor, the poor no longer feel grateful and the generous no longer feel compassionate.

Thus, instead of building bonds between those who have and those who have not, resentment is built between the two groups. Sadly, this animosity is fostered and exploited by politicians on both sides of the aisle (Republican politicians feed on the “- they don’t appreciate all the money you’ve given;” Democrats feed “ – the selfish rich won’t part with what they have.”)

However, when I personally bring your children shoes and see there is no bread on the table, I am moved with compassion to do more. When you bring a loaf of bread to my door and I see you have sold your coat to be able to afford to share what you have with me, I’m not going to say, “What? No butter?”

Truth be told, some of these “conservatives” arguing for government-run nursing homes are only conservative when it comes to their own pocketbooks and their own taxes but when it comes to spending someone else’s money lets have at it after all, “You have two smart phones, I only have one and you have a 56 inch LCD TV mine is only a 42 inch.”

Roger Bannister
Kent

Editor:

I am running for Yates Town Councilman. Let me tell you why. Since the town was audited in 2012, our board appears to be falling back into some old habits. In my opinion, there were no ramifications for the previous attorney’s poor advice. With the breaking of Town Law, overcharging in water district 4, the creation of questionable water districts, and an extension of a water line to benefit a friend, our Town still keeps employment of his firm. http://www.osc.state.ny.us/localgov/audits/towns/2012/yates.pdf.

There were no ramifications for years of poor book-keeping (Shared by Yates and Ridgeway) http://www.osc.state.ny.us/localgov/audits/towns/2012/ridgeway.pdf Both towns spent $16,000-plus with $2,000-plus in yearly upgrades to keep her employment and pension. She is the only employee that does not keep her hours at the Town. Instead she (Legislator Lynne Johnson) is allowed to do the books at her home I.E. her book-keeping firm, road deicing and dust control business under the same name Millennium Roads LLC.

She is a town employee yet has her own book keeping firm. Why are we shelling out for software and pension when we could hire the firm and avoid all those added costs? In my opinion, I do not believe with her job as a legislator, being in charge of committees, many meetings, and her bookkeeping duties at multiple towns and organizations that she should personally do our books. At the very least, any single person spread that thin cannot give us their full attention.

This year again our Town Board has overridden the tax cap and there will be a tax increase. It was explained it is the “Responsible” thing to do. I did not support it because doing the “Responsible” thing is doing what the people who elected you want. Right or wrong, it is an insult to almost every taxpayer when an elected official votes to override the tax cap.

This year James Whipple, who ishead of the Orleans County EDA, will be a contestant for Town Board. Mr. Whipple is paid in the six figures to use taxpayer monies tosupport a business welfare state with no accountability if the results are failure.

Do you think if you elect him to make decisions for your town, he will put your best interests first or that of government? From his record as a village trustee and his record as the EDA head, he will do what ever it takes to sustain and grow government.

In the past elections, residents have elected councilmen that have consistently voted to raise taxes every year and override the tax cap.

Mr. Bentley, also up for re-election, is probably the only board member who ever expresses concern over spending, regulations, or new equipment purchases, but he always votes in favor of it. He has consistently voted to raise taxes and override the tax cap.

This year the highway department got a new 1 ton truck and now a brand new loader at the cost of $155,000 with the old loader at a value of $50,000. The taxpayers will shell out $105,000.

Now come to find out the highway garage needs a new roof, somewhere in the $30,000 range. I would think that spending on the high end of $50,000 on refurbishing the old loader and running it for another five years, then taking the $30,000 savings and doing the roof would be the kind of thinking that would be explored by our elected officials. Sadly no.

I think if there was more scrutiny in the highway department budget and some cutting of non-essential spending in the public safety department, taxes would go down. If you elect me, I will find every dollar wasted and scream from the top of the mountain to stop it.

Voters, you have a clear choice: Vote on the Conservative line. I will never vote to raise your taxes or override the tax cap. I want to make government smaller. I will work with the departments to make sure what they have is adequate, but the days of non-scrutinized budgets and 4-year contracts have to end.

I will respect your private property rights and vote against technology that violates your privacy and 4th amendment rights. I will not single out for banning people from our parks. I will work on cutting government and taxes, staying out of your life as much as possible.

I believe that your pistol permit is the second amendment. All gun laws infringe on your right to keep and bear arms and should be repealed. What you eat, drink or put in your body is none of government’s business. How you live is none of government’s business. I will put my oath of office first and weigh the constitutionality of my decisions regardless of what an activist judge in a black robe has decided. I will fight Albany and Washington’s unfunded mandates and vote against them.

The Constitution and the Bill of Rights are just as valid today as they were when they were written. In November you have a choice. You can vote for R.I.N.O.S (Republicans in name only) or vote for a principled constitutional conservative with the values that made this country great, before the rise of the entitlement society and big local government.

Paul Lauricella
Yates

Editor:

County government is the closest to the day to day needs of the public. When a county government operates in back rooms, behind closed doors, it is more like Washington and fails to take into account the voices of the people.

People can get easily confused when both Democrats and Republicans engage in verbal boxing matches as they lay blame on each other and continue to victimize Americans. When government fails to represent their constituents, there is a shutdown. This can happen on all levels of government: federal, state and county.

What is the most important role of an elected county official? The most difficult and challenging responsibility is to connect and communicate with the citizens in their jurisdiction. The County Legislature should inform and involve their voters.

An effective team of county legislators should communicate with the community so the latter knows what the local government is doing and the people should receive feedback when they approach the Legislature. Trust in government is crucial. When that is lost, there is a shutdown, and people begin to doubt the efficiency of their elected officials.

I have never run for public office, but as a registered Republican, I believe I am owed the following from my elected officials:

1. I want to know that the decisions my legislature makes are based on facts that are available to be reviewed and that debate is open to the public.

2. If I contact my legislators, I should be recognized and provided timely feedback.

3. Effective citizen involvement should be encouraged and respected as an integral part of county government.

4. Local governments should utilize techniques from the marketing and business world that center on delivering an honest message and providing opportunities to explore viable options to preserve county assets.

5. Citizens should be valued for their expertise and opinions on issues within the county. Local governments should encourage shared responsibility for community problem solving. This partnership helps the community and the local government as they tackle problems and simultaneously provides the constituents with a sense of ownership in their community.

If effective interaction between government officials and an informed citizenry is absent, it’s time for a change.

As I look over my own experiences with this present legislature, they have fallen short of my expectations, and I know I am not alone in this thought. On more than one occasion there has been an intentional misrepresentation of numbers on the financial portrait of The Villages, our county nursing home. Deliberate omissions on all county expenditures, related to taxes, have been blatant.

Months before the last county election, those who had loved ones in The Villages received a letter from the Legislature indicating their intent to privatize the facility. As the election drew near, the Legislature realized this was a hot bed topic and retracted that intention, indicating they did not want to sell.

As soon as the election was over, the Legislature picked up the baton and ran with their original intent. Well despite this verbal ping pong match that really bamboozled the public, one thing surfaced. The Legislature was not to be trusted.This Legislature has not been open to any debate on this issue of maintaining The Villages in the public domain.

Despite the presence of nearly 60-plus people at the Legislature meeting in February opposing this decision, they maintained their position on this issue and then had the blatant audacity to hand pick their LDC to finish it off. What an insult to the people they represent.

On more than one occasion I have contacted the legislators to at least get some questions answered. The only legislator to ever get back to me consistently was George Bower. Thank you, Mr. Bower, for doing your job.

Shame on the rest of you for shirking your obligation to one of your constituents. Instead of meeting the challenge of saving one of our most valuable assets in this county and relying on the business savvy of people who could have been instrumental in helping The Villages show more of a profit, this Legislature moved to the first exit sign and closed that door on possibility.

Thank God they’re not in the classroom where young minds are at stake. When a challenge presented itself, I taught young people to not always take the easy way out but to look at consequences for their actions and how those affect others around them. One needs to look at all the empty space at The Villages that, under effective management, could have been bringing in money over the years and ask the Legislature, “Why wasn’t this looked into?”

Actions speak louder than words. The purposeful actions of this present Legislature need to be carefully scrutinized by every citizen in this county before next month’s election. We the people, yes, we the people have the ability to change history, but not with the present Legislature. We need some new blood in there to represent the people and meet our needs.

Mary Bannister
Albion

(Bannister is a member of the Concerned Citizens of Orleans County.)

Editor:

First Responders are part of what reinforces the foundation of our great nation.  They leave their loved ones to deal with emergencies, risking a great deal for those they don’t even know.

They allow us to concentrate on other matters in our lives, knowing if the need arises and we dial 911 someone will be sure to respond.

Emergency Management, law enforcement, ambulance services, medical personnel and fire departments are the protecting hand of emergency response.  Anyone who has ever used one of these services knows the important role that they play in our county. These individuals, who risk their lives every time they are called out, need our utmost support.

They donate their time and effort in saving lives and reducing financial damage to our county’s infrastructure. As it has been calculated, replacing the volunteer firefighters with paid employees would cost the county between $7 million to $8 million a year.

It seems only right that we should give them the tools and equipment needed to perform their jobs as safely as possible, not to squander it on needless political effigies. We should be thankful that people in our county are willing to step forward and perform these services.

Eight years ago, due to the age of the radio system becoming unreliable and producing a lack of coverage, the Orleans County Legislature decided to upgrade the county-wide communications. A contract was signed with the vendor and the issues began. For a resolution over this incident, the county ended up in front of the FCC to testify. A deal was made and the upgrade is going forward.

The end result will be a state of the art communication system when completed in March 2014 with final cut-over to the new system in April 2014.

It has been a long hard road to get to this end point, but the struggle is worth it to give our responders nothing less than the best tools necessary for their safety and success.

With deep appreciation, thank you First Responders, for the outstanding job you do for the residents of our county. Please continue to protect our county and always keep yourselves safe.

Donald Allport
Orleans County Legislator At-Large
Gaines

Editor:

Many people feel historic preservation is just too difficult, especially when the building you are trying to save has suffered neglect and abuse. I hope that by relating this story about the Clarendon Stone Store, others will be encouraged to save more of our historic properties.

The 177-year-old building is now listed on the State and National Registers of Historic Places. It has been vacant since 2007. Plans had been made for its demolition.  But community members told the Town Board that they didn’t want to lose the iconic building that holds many memories. The Board listened and sanctioned a volunteer organization known as the Old Stone Store Preservation Committee.

The committee raised funds through donations, removed debris from the property, made necessary structural repairs, publicized that the property was available and documented the building and its history, which led to the listing on the Registers of Historic Places.

They worked with the Landmark Society of Western New York to raise awareness of the potential of the site.  They conducted many tours for prospective buyers and kept the building in the public eye through various media outlets. None of this required any financial support from the Town.

The committee identified Joe and Sue Fertitta of Hilton as the best potential new owners to bring the building back to life. They have a strong reputation as rehabbers of distressed properties. The Town Board agreed with their plans to make a large two bedroom apartment on the second floor and have commercial or office space on the first floor. They also plan to restore the front porch based on historic photos.

The Town had taken ownership of the property and planned to demolish it to avoid the cost of repair and upkeep. By selling it to the Fertittas for $1, the cost of demolition will be avoided, the property will contribute to the tax base and Clarendon retains a historic building that will once again be an attractive part of the hamlet.

The committee thanks everyone who showed their support for saving this building.  This is a great example of what a community can achieve when they work together.

Erin Anheier
Chairperson, OSSPC
Holley

Editor:

Who will take care of you?  Do you have a list of loving people who will be waiting to take care of you when the time comes and it will come. Your crystal ball works better than mine and I have a loving family.

One car accident, one doctor’s appointment can change anyone’s life at any moment. It is smug how some feel differently. But it is for sure that we will all die, and it is a comfort to know that there is top quality skilled care close to home when it is needed.

Or will we have to send loved ones out of the county for affordable care? Then we, the taxpayers, will pay another county the Medicaid payment to take care of our loved ones.  Because of distance, visits from us will be fewer. The money won’t be kept here to support our County Nursing Home.

The sale of Orchard Manor in Medina to a big out-of-state corporation should have opened many eyes. It is said that one of the legislators who has a parent in Orchard Manor talked to the person in charge because their parent was not being cared for properly. The care and treatment of employees seem to have gone downhill quickly, as well. Then that same legislator took the big wigs from Orchard Manor on a possible buyer’s tour of the Villages and showed them around. (Does that suggest poor judgment?)

The bottom line for many is most important. The County Nursing Home is not supposed to make money. But the current legislators have not done everything they can do to change the bottom line. They are being deceitful not to include the previous year’s IGT revenues in the bottom line showing a larger deficit than should be. You wonder why this side’s numbers are different from that side’s numbers; well this is one of the reasons – DECEIT.

Politics as usual aren’t working anymore.

We need people who are willing to look for ways to bring in more revenues, like finding tenants for current facilities not being used at the County Nursing Home. A & B wings could bring in more revenue.

The Building and Grounds Department renovated part of A wing to house the Board of Elections Office. Why can’t they renovate the other unused areas that are available?  Because a majority of the current Legislators are not interested in finding more revenue.

It has been in some of the legislators’ minds to sell at the first chance available. Shame on them. They don’t want to hear any constructive ideas or anything good about having a county-owned nursing home. If they can’t do the job for the residents of Orleans County, they should be voted out. If there is no one running against them, we should not vote for them to show them we disapprove.

Vote for the four “Save Our County Nursing Home” candidates who are running. There is way too much back scratching going on in this county. We the voters can make a difference. Vote at the polls or absentee ballot. Let your voice be heard.

Claudette Creasey
Medina

Editor:

Congressional representatives in Washington DC could learn a lesson from the politically cooperative efforts of the Concerned Citizens group in Orleans County.

We are extremely politically diverse with members who are Conservatives, Tea Party Patriots, Republicans, Democrats and Independents. There may be other political affiliations present that I am not aware of because we do not spend time discussing politics.

Some of our group currently has family members or friends at The Villages of Orleans. It is amazing to me that some have had family members that have passed but feel so strongly about the care their loved one received, compared to private facilities, that they are still working for the cause. Others are there because they know that Orleans County citizens have a caring heart and they want to keep it that way.

This non-political group is putting efforts into keeping the County Nursing Home public. It is premature to sell it without investigating how to make it a financially viable facility. We are not saying that the current legislators may not have tried to do this but all stones have not yet been turned over.

Have the billing practices of The Villages received every last dime of Federal, State and private pay money due to it? We have reason to believe it has not, considering how Genesee County has recovered $500,000 in just six weeks by re-submitting claims to Medicaid and Medicare.

Has anyone contacted the other county operated nursing homes to form a co-op to increase our buying power and get lower prices? Are we taking advantage of New York State’s collective buying power, as do our local school districts? I do not know the answer to these two questions but would like an opportunity to find out. These are just a few possibilities.

Let us not wake up one day and find out that we made a mistake. We need legislators with the ability to think outside the box and problem solve for the benefit of our citizens.

I strongly urge the voters to consider that there are two sides to every issue. We are putting in long hours and working hard in the hopes we keep the nursing home for future generations. There is no personal gain for any of our members except to have The Villages as an insurance policy that no one wants to use but it is sure great to have it there if needed.

We have little money, raising it through activities like spaghetti suppers. Our essential information is printed on plain white paper that everyone needs to read before voting. This election really affects your future.

Please consider both sides carefully rather than just voting a party line.

Linda Rak
Lyndonville

(Rak is a candidate for County Legislature. She is endorsed by the Conservative Party and is running under the independent “Save Our Nursing Home” line.)

Editor:

It was recently reported that the Orleans County Legislature can not legally initiate a referendum concerning the sale of the County Nursing Home. (Click here to see that article.) This does not excuse your elected officials from listening to the voters.

At a public meeting in February 2013, 90 percent of the spectators that spoke were against the sale of the nursing home to a private corporation. That very day your legislators voted to create a LDC, a non-elected body to oversee the sale of the facility.

It appears that the majority of your legislators had already decided prior to the public meeting. Are they considering the voters they represent and the needs of the elderly?

This is a major decision involving a facility worth millions of taxpayer dollars in both property and services. It will not help us as taxpayers if it should be sold for less its value.

It involves the lives of hundreds of current and future residents. It is imperative that voters have a voice. The only chance Orleans County citizens have is to vote for candidates on Nov. 5 who will do everything in their power to try keep the home public.

One example is to examine how Genesee County recovered an additional $5.2 million from Medicaid and Medicare reimbursements.Can this and other measures be done in Orleans County to help the financial status of the nursing home?

All the “Save Our Nursing Home” candidates on the ballot want a chance to try and work hard for your best interests.

If the current legislators have the power to do this without considering what the majority of people want, what else do they have the power to do?

Linda Rak
Lyndonville

(Rak is a candidate for County Legislature. She is endorsed by the Conservative Party and is running under the independent “Save Our Nursing Home” line.)

Editor:

In an article on the Orleans Hub, Orleans County Legislature Chairman David Callard stated the best way to preserve the nursing home for the community is to sell the site so it can be run by a private operator. That would ensure a high quality of care for residents, while maintaining jobs and preserving programs, “without dire financial consequences to the taxpayers.”

Just take a look at Orchard Manor to get an idea of what happens when a nursing home is sold into a for-profit situation. Staff is immediately let go. Management did not respond to staff concerns that residents were not being given the best care.

Who is to say that Orchard Manor will not be resold and resold again, or even closed, if the for-profit owners don’t make a profit they feel is adequate. What about the residents in all of this? What about the folks who have loved ones in the facility?

The Villages is a 4-star facility. Residents are well taken care of. It is in the center of Orleans County so it is not a long drive to visit a loved one there.

The voters of Orleans County have the power to complain to their representatives if anything should need to be corrected there. And of course the residents of the county can vote the Legislature out of office if they do not listen to the wishes of Orleans County residents to keep The Villages as a not-for-profit facility.

I do not agree at all with Chairman Callard’s statement that a for-profit business is in the best interest of residents of Orleans County. Remember to vote on Election Day for the Save the Nursing Home candidates. Let your vote be in favor of keeping The Villages as a not-for-profit facility.

Gail Miller
Medina

Editor:

Other than an invaluable, Federally-rated, Four Star quality, skilled nursing facility, what else would Orleans County taxpayers be giving up should Our County Nursing Home (The Villages of Orleans) be sold?

We know that we would be giving up an IGT benefit of $1 to $2 million a year. We would be losing the space presently occupied by the County Health Department and The Board of Elections.We would be handing any new owner the income potential of “A” and “B” wings and at a minimum price of $5.5 million a 1995 space that is still in great condition. This accounting does not include $10 million worth of 2007 space and upgraded infrastructure.

It turns out there may be more.

Paul Mrozek of The Daily News in Batavia has reported (9/5 and 9/12/13) that Genesee County lawmakerselected by Genesee County voters hired Freed-Maxick Health Solutions to recover millions in Medicare and Medicaid reimbursements owed to Genesee County’s nursing home for the past year.

To recover some $5.2 million, Genesee authorized the expenditure of no more than $50,000. According to Mrozek’s reporting, such an effort must be made within a year of a billable service being provided to a nursing home resident.

Likewise, Freed-Maxick has been retained to “capture” outstanding private pay accounts receivable in Genesee County. If I read him right, Genesee lawmakers already recovered $500,000 by spending $37,500.That is a refreshingly “business-like” approach.

Mrozek’s reporting raises obvious questions for Orleans County taxpayers.Does Orleans have a similar time-sensitive billing mess on its hands? If so, what are we doing to recover what is owed the taxpayers of Orleans County? Would any new owner of “The Villages of Orleans” be able to “capture” reimbursements and accounts receivable owed to Orleans but not applied for during the previous year?

Under the LDC format used in Orleans, a decision to bring in Freed-Maxick to pursue what is owed Orleans County has presumably been the responsibility of the LDC Board for months now. Of course, the LDC “Board” doesn’t answer to the taxpayers!

Shouldn’t the purchase price of “The Villages of Orleans”if it is sold reflect any potential windfall from such reimbursements and private pay accounts receivable?

There may be a huge downside to letting an LDC Board decide who walks away with the “buy” of a lifetime.

Gary Kent
Albion

(Kent is a candidate for Orleans County Legislature, endorsed by the Democratic Party and also running under the independent “Save Our Nursing Home” party.)

Editor:

As a proud citizen of Orleans County, I must respond to Legislator Eick’s Reader View in The Medina Journal-Register dated Sept. 25, 2013.

The problem with the Legislators’ decision on The Villages is that it was made without a thorough investigation of what they were doing. Had they waited for the August report on New York State’s public nursing homes conducted by the Center for Governmental Research, they would have realized that Orleans County is one of the last places that should be selling its nursing home.

The three conditions that are cited in the report as reasons not to sell are all present in Orleans. We have a rapidly growing senior population (fifth highest rate of increase out of the 33 counties that have public nursing homes), a high proportion of “hard to place” people such as Medicaid eligibles and Alzheimer’s sufferers, and few other long-term care options other than The Villages of Orleans.

On top of that, the legislators ignored public sentiment expressed at the public hearing. They seem to think they can do whatever they like, keep people in the dark, and possibly even distort the truth.

Their attitude in 2008 toward the sales tax on home heating fuel was indicative of how out of touch they are with the generally decent people who live around here.

These same legislators are quick to fault food stamp recipients, but think nothing of taking from their elders all the freedom and security won for them by their parents and grandparents.

Mr. Eick and the other legislators think the county really cannot afford to do right by people who have always been there for us. Our senior citizens have paid their taxes, secured our freedom, fought our fires, and otherwise sacrificed to help build the county into what it is today.

The comments Mr. Eick has made about CGR may not tell the true story. The cost of a county-specific CGR study is worth it, considering the expert information that could be reaped. Did the Legislature ever investigate what a study would cost? To my knowledge, the answer is no.

What the legislators are doing is like me trying to repair an automatic transmission without having a shop manual on transmissions.

Are these public servants afraid the CGR would reveal true facts and show that Our County Nursing Home, The Villages of Orleans, should not be sold?

Respectfully,

Timothy Good
Albion

Provided photo – State Assemblyman Steve Hawley is pictured at a monument in Washington, D.C. with local veterans as part of a Patriot Trip.

Editor:

Petty, party-line politics have halted business in Washington D.C., leaving many Americans with a distrust and disinterest in government at all levels. It is truly disheartening to see such issues casting a pall on the institution of public service, and it will take time to rebuild the trust that is eroding as we speak. There is an aspect of the federal government shutdown where no time can be wasted, however: the re-opening of the monuments and memorials dedicated to the honorable men and women who have sacrificed for our country.

Over the last six years, I have had the honor of leading an annual Patriot Trip with local veterans to Washington D.C., visiting the sites and venues dedicated to their service. Throughout the course of the trip, more than 650 veterans and family members have embarked on this emotional journey, which has featured many of the monuments and memorials currently shut down due to gridlock within the federal government.

This year’s trip included veterans from the World War II, Korean and Vietnam War eras who put their lives on the line in defense of our freedom and way of life. I cannot imagine showing up with my bus full of veterans and having to tell them their government would not allow them to experience the structures specifically meant to recognize their personal sacrifice.

The mere fact that open-air venues would be closed off to the public illustrates just how far the government has gone astray. While departments, employees and entities have been deemed “non-essential” and had their operations put on hold, it’s actually taking effort to keep veterans away from these destinations. Conversely, the groups of veterans who have broken through the barricades at the World War II memorial show the indomitable spirit of our servicemen and women. As always, these veterans have shown that strength in one’s convictions and a willingness to let actions speak louder than words will always win the day. This is a lesson from which many of the people responsible for the government shutdown could stand to learn.

As Ranking Minority Member on the Assembly Committee on Veterans Affairs, I understand that government must step up to the plate to recognize and honor the sacrifice made by our courageous heroes. If government can’t get that right, then I can’t blame the American public for being disheartened. I urge the National Park Service to right this wrong and re-open these monuments and memorials at once, not only to honor our veterans, but to show that government is capable of fulfilling its most basic and essential duties.

Assemblyman Steve Hawley
139^th District

Editor:

Once a precious gem goes down the drain, it is lost forever. Orleans County residents are in jeopardy of losing a precious gem, our County Nursing Home known as The Villages. Your County Legislators have appointed a three person non-elected committee to sell the county home to a profit-making company.

What does this mean to you? It means that once the money from the sale is used, it will not save you tax money and may even cost you more since the taxpayers will always be responsible for Medicaid patients. If local private nursing homes refuse our county Medicaid patients, they may have to be sent to other far-away counties at cost to Orleans County taxpayers. Families may have to travel long distances to visit their relatives.

Our family members and we are all just a heartbeat away from needing skilled nursing services due to age, illness or accident. At $8000 or more per month, how long will your family be able to private pay? At about $51.14 per $100,000 of assessed valuation on your county taxes, this publicly owned nursing home is a bargain and insurance for all of us in the event of disaster.

Would you be willing to pay $10, $20 or $30 a year more in taxes to keep this four-star federally rated facility public so that it might continue to offer excellent services to county residents? We pay $185 a year for garbage services. Our ancestors supported it starting in the 1833 even through the Great Depression in the 1930’s.

Demand a voice in this process. Demand a referendum by calling or writing your elected representatives. If the Legislators sell the County Nursing Home without asking the voters, what else do they have the power to do?

It may be time to elect new Legislators that will listen!

Linda Rak
Lyndonville

(Rak is a candidate for County Legislature. She is endorsed by the Conservative Party and is running under the independent “Save Our Nursing Home” line.)

Editor:

If you have ever been to The Mall in Washington D.C. and visited the WWII Memorial then you know the feeling of pride to be an American. I cannot imagine what these heroes feel when they stand inside the memorial and those horrific memories of that time come flooding back.

I have noticed during my life, those who fought in WWII never speak of their memories. It is only recently that my father-in-law mentions WWII. He served as a machine gunner on a tank under General Patton. He mentions no details, just some general information, but it shows in his eyes that after 70 years those unforgettable memories are as if they happened just yesterday.

Here is a generation born during the Roaring Twenties and the mob’s influence, surviving the Great Depression as children and young teens only to go to war in the prime of their lives to fight pure evil. They sacrificed their innocence and lives to defend our country, the Constitution and to free millions of people around the world from suppression and tyranny. They sacrificed a great deal, as do all who serve, never expecting gratitude or worship. They gave their lives to end evil in the world and keep America free.

How does this current administration repay these Veterans’ sacrifices? By denying these veterans access to an open-air, free-to-enter memorial, honoring what they accomplished in WWII.  Many thanks to Representatives Louie Gohmert (TX) and Michele Bachman (MN) for doing the right thing by going down to the memorial and removing the barricades, allowing these Veterans to enter a memorial dedicated to their sacrifices. These veterans stood united and sang “Amazing Grace,” what a true American moment.

How did our leaders react, by bringing in armed guards, making the barricade taller and denying all access to these heroes? These dignified American Veterans deserve so much better from our country.

What sadness these WWII Veterans must feel to watch their country roar down the evil road of big suppressive government, the very thing they fought and many died to defeat, I can only try to imagine. The world owes these individuals and their sacrifices a tremendous debt, but even a simple Thank-you from time to time would be nice. Instead history books are being rewritten minimizing their accomplishments.

As someone who grew up in a free America and enjoys all that it has to offer, I say Thank-you Veterans for allowing me this opportunity. Tell your stories so that the truth will live on because the current leaders are trying to make everyone forget your true American Patriotism.

Isn’t it ironic that it takes 90-year-old war heroes to remind us what America is about. So when you stand and pledge allegiance to our country, think of these Veterans and how they are still standing up for our country.

God Bless America, God Bless our troops and God Bless those who fought for us during our finest hour.

Donald Allport
Gaines
Orleans County Legislator At-Large

Editor:

In preparation for the coming election I went door to door at Heritage Estates with another volunteer, Sharon Algeo. We were getting signatures in support of candidates for legislature who have committed to stopping the possible sale of our nursing home.

One of the residents of Heritage Estates had a guest visiting from Wellsville, NY. He wished us the best.  He said, “We lost our nursing home, now we only have an empty building.” He went on to share that a private corporation had bought their nursing home and a few years after they took over, they closed it because it wasn’t profitable.

This is the worst-case scenario we are trying to avoid. This is the nightmare that could happen in our community. There are people who want us to believe a sale is a done deal.It is not sold yet; it is not a done deal. If you believe it’s over before it is, we all lose. This is important enough that for this election I am a single-issue voter.

We are all busy with our own lives; it is hard to find time to pay attention to what the government is doing, and most of the time that is fine.  Most of the time, we can trust that our local officials are doing okay, and we can go about our lives. This is not one of the times!

I met another resident of Heritage Estates, an older woman whose husband had been at The Villages for about a year. She was happy with his care and could visit him often. What would she do if we sell The Villages and the company decides it doesn’t make enough profit? We have an empty building, and her husband is in Rochester or Buffalo.  She was old enough that this would be a major hardship.

I am asking my fellow Orleans County voters that if you would like to save The Villages for future generations of elders in our community, become a single-issue voter for this campaign. Vote for candidates on the Save the Nursing Home line, and two others endorsed by The Concerned Citizens of Orleans County.

Thank you for your concern,

Betty García Mathewson
Albion