Editor:

As many people know, there are months dedicated to “domestic violence awareness” and “breast cancer awareness”, as well as many other causes. However, what many people don’t know is that April is Child Abuse Awareness and Prevention month.

Child abuse is an uncomfortable and sensitive issue to discuss. Unfortunately, the sad reality is that it is happening every day across the United States. Annually, more than 700,000 children are abused in the United States. As a result of abuse and neglect, an estimated four to seven children die each day at the hands of their abusers. Like sexual assault, the perpetrator is most likely to be someone close to the child—90% of abusers are parents or a relative of the child.

It is imperative that we all familiarize ourselves with the signs of child abuse and report it if we suspect that a child is being abused. You can be the reason that a child survives and gets a second chance. I was that child. I am a survivor. Please, stand up and act when you suspect that this injustice is taking place!

Child Protective Services Hotline: 1-800-342-3720

James White

Gaines

Editor:

It was with great interest that I read your article on the proposed Barre Fire Hall. This would be a wonderful thing for Barre – not just from a safety perspective, but the Community Center would be a much needed anchor for bringing the residents together for many important community events.

The recent wind storm is a perfect example when 636 of 927 customers served in the Town of Barre were without power. The new proposed Fire Hall and Community Center would have served as a Community Warming Center.

Since the original price tag of $1.4 million was voted down in 2014, the costs have increased nearly double to $ 2.5 million. But something else has also increased, and that is a possible funding source for the new Fire Hall and Community Center.

Barre residents have the opportunity, through Heritage Wind, to reap the wonderful community benefits of a wind farm. Local taxing jurisdictions (County, School, and Town) would share the estimated $1.6 million per year. This is over and above what the participating land owners would be paid.

Barre’s Town portion would give them a great jump on this needed Fire Hall and Community Center. I feel certain that the Town of Barre residents will continue their methodical review of the Heritage project as they have done so far. They will logically and rationally look for the facts and follow the Article 10 process in hopes of bringing new prosperity to their hometown.

I would encourage others to look into wind energy and how it can revitalize our counties, our schools, and our towns. Look for the facts, rather than hearsay, and realize what a great opportunity we all have in front of us!

Howard Pierce

Lyndonville

Editor:

National Doctors’ Day, which is celebrated today, March 30, provides us with an excellent opportunity to reach out and thank our area physicians for their many contributions to ensuring high caliber healthcare in this community.

Regardless of the setting in which they provide care or administrative leadership, physicians make a tremendous difference in the lives of countless patients and family members each and every day.

The various programs and facilities of Orleans Community Health have the great privilege of collaborating with a number of specialists, hospitalists, medical directors and primary care physicians throughout Orleans County and Western NY.

A strong working rapport with these physicians is greatly appreciated and enjoyed by all of the programs and facilities of Orleans Community Health, which include a 24/7 Emergency Department, Stroke Care Center, Medical Surgical Unit, Transitional Care Unit, Skilled Nursing Facility, Surgical Services, Physical, Occupational and Speech Rehabilitative Services, Cardiac Services, Lab Services, Respiratory Care, Wellness Services, Occupational/Work Place Health, Primary Care/ Walk In Medical Care, and two Dialysis Centers.

On behalf of the entire Board of Directors, leadership and staff of Orleans Community Health, I appreciate the chance to publicly recognize and thank our area physicians for their impressive commitment to outstanding care. Because of them, residents of our community are able to receive the very best healthcare services close to home.

Wendy Jacobson

President / Chief Executive Officer

Orleans Community Health

Editor:

If the news is true that State Senator Rob Ortt has been indicted and that Representative Chris Collins is scurrying with his tail between his legs after the collapse of the national health care legislation he championed, S.O.S. (Serve Our Selves?) has lost two of its biggest supporters in the halls of legislative power.

Their demise may not be inevitable, but it will be excruciatingly harmful to their political stars. Will Rob find few friends in Albany now who will talk to him, let alone seek his advice? Collins faces a similar fate: Chris who?

Both men failed to do their homework relating to the Article 10 application for the planned windmill farm stretching across swaths of Yates and Somerset. They were suckered into the untruths about the dangers imposed to the Niagara air base by the windmill farm.

Now that the missions cobbled together to breathe life into the Falls facility have radically shifted, the phony-baloney bogeyman espoused by S.O.S. and their political lackeys seems pathetically irrelevant. The myth of the physical threat and the dangerous radar-interference evaporates. Some of the local political leaders are sophisticated enough to recognize that radars are being replaced by satellite and cellphone technology, emasculating their proximity argument.

The Somerset board, like a petulant child, approved the two MET towers last week, but only after imposing odious requirements on them that are not required on any other such structures in their town.

Where were these same Luddites when the coal pollution belching Somerset power plant was being planned? Sometimes, it seems like the Somerset board is just trying to shake down Apex like they did Senator Maziarz when he got them three-quarters of a million dollars for Barker schools because the obsolete Somerset plant wasn’t generating the obscene tax revenue it did in its heyday.

If the disgracing of their parochial championing pols isn’t enough, they both may need a good “slap in the face” to come to their senses: stop your obstructionist follies. Let the Article10 process proceed. You’re both beating a dead horse.

Ralph E. Smith

Lyndonville

Editor:

Gov. Cuomo is quick to announce climate change is real and not be wished away by rhetoric or denial.

The Governor should follow his own rhetoric. He may be one of the largest individual consumer of fossil fuel in the state. His numerous trips, be it by plane or helicopter, to different states and countries use massive amounts of fossil fuel. This all to forge his dreams of a future presidential run.

The Governor could care less about the climate change if it impacts his lifestyle. I just wonder how large his carbon footprint is?

If he was truly concerned about climate changes, he would lead by example. Judging by the continual decline in state population, his policies and vision has helped lower New York’s carbon footprint. He has aggressively fought climate change by forcing people to leave the state.

Edward Urbanik

Lyndonville

Editor:

The Great Lakes are a global, national, and local treasure.  These inland seas are an important industrial artery, and they provide drinking water, fishing, boating and tourism opportunities, as well jobs for millions of Americans and Canadians.

Since 2009, the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative (GLRI) has promoted pollution control, shoreline improvement, fish and wildlife protection, and invasive species monitoring and abatement.

Now, the White House is proposing to slash funding for the GLRI by 97%. Because of this cut, the Army Corps of Engineers announced last month that they would delay a major report concerning ways to prevent Asian Carp invasion of the Great Lakes. In some locations in the Mississippi and Illinois Rivers, Asian Carp have consumed so many aquatic resources that they have pushed out 97% of the native fish species. In these areas, boating has become dangerous because the carp jump high into the air, sometimes knocking people overboard. Defunding the GLRI will bring these deadly invaders ever closer to our own waters.

Orleans County’s current and future economic status is closely tied to the health of the Great Lakes and their tributaries. Those of us lucky enough to live here get our drinking water from Lake Ontario, fish and boat in its waters, enjoy its waterfowl, and benefit from tourism dollars must oppose plans to defund the GLRI.

A Facebook group called “All Hands On Deck” has been formed to this end. Please consider joining this group and participating in efforts to preserve the Great Lakes for ourselves and future generations.

Sandy Chenelly

Waterport

Editor:

In response to the letter submitted by the group “New Yorkers Against Gun Violence”.

Upstate New York is treated differently in many ways from Downstate New York State. Most recently in the news are the issues of minimum wage, ride hailing services like Uber and Lyft, and education funding.

While gun ownership has increased significantly over the last 20+ years, especially notable in the past several years with month after month of record NICS Checks, the rate of gun violence and homicides has dropped over 50 percent.

The exceptions to those statistics would be the increase in gun violence in cities that have been run by Liberal Democrats for generations – like Chicago. If you were to look at the statistics from the Bureau of Justice over the past 20 years, you would see that Non-Lethal Firearms Victimizations have dropped from about 6 per 1,000 citizens to less than 2 per 1,000 citizens.

Firearms Fatalities have dropped from about 7 per 100,000 citizens to about 3.4 per 100,000 citizens. That is over a 50 percent reduction in each category. Perhaps New Yorkers Against Gun Violence should pick up a “Reliable” source on this matter like the book “More Guns, Less Crime” by John R. Lott, Jr., PhD.

Also, stated in their letter was the “overwhelming bi-partisan support” that voted in support of the SAFE ACT.  I’m not sure if I would consider passing a bill in the middle of the night under the guise of a Message of Necessity, without the legislators having a chance to study it, let alone to speak to their constituents overwhelming support? The actual lack of support can be seen when you learn that 52 of 62 New York State Counties (83%) passed Resolutions in Opposition to the SAFE ACT. There were only two Counties north of Westchester County that did not oppose it, Albany County and Tompkins County, no surprises there. With that amount of “Overwhelming Opposition” I cannot understand how the most recent Sienna poll could possibly say that statewide 60 percent of registered voters support the SAFE Act. Unless you consider that a disproportionate number of registered voters live Downstate.

Also, noted in the letter that New York gun ownership is low – 18 percent. Again, that number is due to the fact that the majority of New York’s population is Downstate, New York City. It is nearly impossible to own a gun there unless you are wealthy and/or politically connected. I think you would find the percentage of citizens with firearms much higher Upstate.

The NY SAFE ACT was a terrible law that was ill conceived and hastily passed. It has nothing to do with safety. Criminals by their very definition do not obey laws and will not obey the provisions of the SAFE ACT. It only takes away the rights of the honest citizens of this State. It is no wonder why people are leaving New York State in such large numbers looking for freedom from such tyrannical laws and exorbitant taxes.

Sincerely,

Christopher S. Rice

Albion

Editor:

What do we really know about the people who immigrated to the United States for three hundred plus years beginning in the early 1600’s?

English separatists, it might be fair to say, were people who were principled non-conformists who decided to take their chances with the Pequots and Narragansetts rather than accept persecution for what they believed. They gave up familiar surroundings for religious freedom. Today we sometimes call such people “refugees”.

South Florida’s Cuban-American population exited Cuba rather than live under Castro. Today, they are some of our most patriotic Americans.

When a family leaves Oaxaca, Mexico and travels close to three thousand miles to try their hand at life in an area where Spanish isn’t even the first language, what does that suggest about them? After all, most of those in their village will never leave, preferring to live out their lives in familiar surroundings regardless of how difficult life may be.

To me it says those who decide to leave are more determined to improve their lives than those who do not. It suggests those who decide to forsake all that they know for an unknown have confidence and courage that most of their neighbors do not. It is likely whoever initiated the move possesses considerable imagination and likely has a plan. A willingness to leave all that is familiar behind—just as it always has—suggests uncommon ability that provides such a dreamer with a sense that he/she can pull it off in a strange new land where not everyone welcomes him/her.

Our ancestors very likely were such people. The land of their birth—familiar though it was—wasn’t meeting their expectations. They may have prized more social mobility, economic opportunity, or religious or political freedom than they had—or were ever likely to have—in their native country.  You see, our ancestors rolled the dice. They were risk takers, which is just the “ticket” in a free enterprise system.

It has long been my conviction that the United States is an exceptional country because its people are generally the descendants of exceptional people, if for no other reason than they left.  Immigrants are typically the exception, not the rule.  Those who are willing to put up with less stay put.

Say what you will about today’s immigrants, their essential experience is, in most regards, no different than it has been since 1607. One needs look no further than the vast majority of newly arrived people from south of the Rio Grande to confirm that they, too, fit the profile of our immigrant origins.

The United States is an extraordinary country largely because our ancestors were not ordinary. Whether they came to clear the woods with an axe to make room for a forty acre farm, dig the Canal with picks and shovels, mine and fashion the stone used to build a 175 foot church steeple in Albion, sit on a cabbage planter all day in the summer heat and dust, cut the mature cabbage heads in the mud during another frigid and rainy November, or establish a Mexican restaurant that is the talk of Western New York State, they likely didn’t do it on a whim. Leaving your familiar birthplace to travel thousands of miles to take a chance that life could be better in a strange place never has been anything like trying a new hairstyle.

America is similar to a functional patchwork quilt that isn’t yours or mine; it is ours. It has become an inspiration to the world no matter where ancestry.com tells us we originated. To me, God may have put innumerable different people on earth as a challenge. Might they look past superficial differences and get along? The answer provided by the American experience has generally been a resounding, “Yes”!

Sincerely yours,

Gary Kent

Albion

Editor:

A minority of upstate legislators have introduced legislation to remove all of upstate NY from the protections of the NY SAFE Act. State Senators Robert Ortt and Patrick Gallivan introduced legislation to repeal the SAFE Act law everywhere in New York State except New York City.

We question why upstate should be treated any differently than New York City when it comes to gun safety legislation? Why should our children and grandchildren be exposed to the risks of gun violence in their homes, schools and at play?

Every reliable study on this issue has demonstrated, beyond dispute, that more guns equals more gun violence and that effective gun laws equates to less gun violence and fewer gun deaths in our communities.

You will recall that NY SAFE was enacted with overwhelming support by a large bi-partisan coalition of state legislators and to date, we have not heard any legislator publicly convey regret that they voted in support of the Act.

The SAFE Act has been upheld in every court that has heard a case involving the Act. In fact, the US Supreme Court has refused to hear an appeal of a case challenging similar gun-safety-legislation in the State of Connecticut.

The most recent poll from Siena College shows that statewide the SAFE Act is supported by 60% of registered voters. And, despite the dissemination of “alternative facts”, each of the individual components of the SAFE Act receives overwhelming support from upstate voters. Background checks for all gun sales (81%); revocation of pistol permits for domestic orders of protection (78%); five-year pistol permit renewals (82%); assault-weapon ban (67%); ammunition background checks (56%); and limiting high-capacity magazines (52%).

It is also noteworthy that because of the low overall gun ownership across New York State (18%) and the SAFE Act, New York has the 3^rd lowest gun death rate in the country despite a population of nearly 20 million people and more than 80 million visitors annually.

Moreover, in the grand scheme of things most New Yorkers are not overly concerned with debating the SAFE Act. Upstate voters, like the rest of the state, are more focused on education, the economy and jobs than opposing the SAFE Act. The Siena college poll referenced above shows that the issues motivating upstate voters are largely economic – 13% cite jobs, 12% each for taxes and education; less than 1% mention guns or the SAFE Act.

Legislators are being disingenuous when they assert that the SAFE Act is overwhelmingly opposed upstate.

New Yorkers, including those of us upstate, stand strong with the 90% of Americans who support basic and common sense gun safety laws, like our NY SAFE Act.

Respectfully,

Patricia Tuz – Capital Region

Paul McQuillen – Buffalo

Gary Pudup – Rochester

Alexandra Dubroff – Hudson Valley

Regional Coordinators

New Yorkers Against Gun Violence

Editor:

NYSAC (New York State Association of Counties) and New York State’s county governments commend Congressman Chris Collins for introducing legislation that would reduce county property taxes in New York State by $2.3 billion dollars.

The federal legislation introduced by Congressman Collins attempts to do what the State has been politically unwilling or unable to do.  It provides real mandate relief for counties, so that counties can begin to reduce property taxes in the State.

Governor Cuomo continues to highlight that the largest tax burden New Yorkers face is the property tax. County leaders agree 100 percent – property taxes are too high in New York, especially compared to other states. One of the reasons that we have high property taxes is that counties in New York are required to pay for State services and programs that other counties across the nation do not.

To further illustrate this point, across the nation, there are 3,069 counties. Together, the counties across the nation contribute about $9.7 billion each year in locally raised taxes to support the direct program costs of providing Medicaid services to recipients in their state (not including the costs of operating more than 1000 county owned hospitals, clinics and nursing homes).  Alarmingly, the local taxpayers in New York’s 57 counties and New York City are required under state law to pay $7.5 billion annually to support New York’s largest in the nation Medicaid program. That means New York’s county taxpayers spend more than triple what all the other county taxpayers in the nation pay combined!

We are disappointed that the State’s Lt. Governor, who has been a friend to counties, would oppose an action that would reduce property taxes and take a position against the state’s county government partners.  The Governor’s administration can’t have it both ways.  They cannot keep shifting costs to counties and force us to continue paying for their programs on the hand, and then demand lower property taxes on the other.

Providing counties in New York authority to charge a local sales tax to help finance a state designed and controlled Medicaid program may have been important in 1966, but since then state elected officials have dumped more than 40 other unfunded state mandates on county government and broken more promises on maintaining state funding through programs sold as “partnerships” between the state and counties than we care to mention.

Counties in other states do not need sales tax authority because they do not have such enormous fiscal burdens placed on them by their State elected leaders. The Kerr-Mills health program mentioned in the Lt. Governor’s press release started out as a “partnership” but was identified as a miserable failure by Congress within a few years because of a lack of resources with less than 1 percent of eligible seniors nationwide receiving services and less than 2 percent of seniors in New York State.

This is not a partisan issue. This is a stewardship issue.  In 2011, when Congress enacted the stimulus plan, Senator Chuck Schumer made sure to protect New York State county property taxpayers because of the role we play in paying for Medicaid.

Counties want to do the work of reducing property taxes for the homeowners and businesses in New York.

Again, we commend Congressman Collin for introducing this legislation, and we encourage the rest of our congressional delegation to sign on to the measure.

It’s time for the State to stop playing the blame game and start lowering the costs it imposes on counties so that we can begin to lower property taxes.

Stephen J. Acquario

NYSAC Executive Director

Albany