Ortt, Senate GOP: $32 million in opioid settlement should go to treatment, recovery services

Posted 27 April 2021 at 11:21 am

Press Release, State Senate Republican Leader Robert Ortt

Senate Republican Leader Ortt, along with Senators Peter Oberacker, Fred Akshar and Phil Boyle, on Monday echoed the calls of advocates throughout the state to ensure that any future opioid settlement funds be put into a “lockbox” dedicated to improve and expand treatment and recovery services for New Yorkers struggling with addiction.

The call follows passage of a state budget, negotiated between Governor Cuomo and legislative Democrats, that funneled opioid settlement funds into the general fund instead of creating a dedicated “lockbox” that could be used to enhance and increase investment in much needed prevention, treatment, and recovery services for New Yorkers who are struggling with addiction.

Earlier this year, New York State Attorney General Letitia James, along with a coalition of AGs from 47 states, announced a $573 million settlement agreement with McKinsey & Company for their role in the ongoing opioid epidemic. New York State will receive more than $32 million from the agreement.

Upon the announcement of the award, advocates and lawmakers urged the money – and all future opioid settlement funds – be put in a “lockbox” for the sole purpose of expanding and improving prevention, treatment, recovery and support services for those struggling with addiction or in recovery. Senate Democrats hailed a proposal they included in their one-house proposal to do so – but instead, voted in favor of the enacted budget that failed to create a dedicated “lockbox” for the settlement funds.

In a letter to Governor Cuomo, the Senators expressed frustration at the final budget language that gives the Executive broad authority on how to disperse the funds, and called on him to ensure that the entire amount is used toward enhancing treatment and recovery services throughout the state.

“Senate Democrats are talking out of both sides of their mouths – they said one thing in their one house, but did another when they voted in favor of the final budget that funneled a majority of the opioid settlement funds into the general fund,” Ortt said. “Yet, now they claim ‘No administration should have the ability to use opioid settlement to supplant state aid rather than to supplement the effort.’ They voted for this budget that did exactly that, so their calls now for a dedicated lockbox are disingenuous at best – talk about too little too late.”