Municipalities should refrain from adding fluoride to water
Editor:
Policymakers should reconsider decisions to fluoridate public water supplies. A growing body of scientific evidence suggests that the practice may pose significant health risks that warrant serious consideration and immediate action.
The practice of water fluoridation is not universal and is subject to ongoing debate. Some countries and municipalities have chosen to discontinue fluoridation, citing modern dental hygiene practices (such as the widespread use of fluoride toothpaste) and the philosophy of individual choice regarding fluoride exposure. The decision to fluoridate water remains a local one, influenced by specific community health needs, public opinion, and the interpretation of current scientific evidence.
Excessive fluoride exposure is linked to dental fluorosis, a condition characterized by the discoloration and, in severe cases, the erosion of tooth enamel. This cosmetic concern, prevalent in children exposed to high fluoride levels, is just the tip of the iceberg.
More alarming are studies indicating a correlation between high fluoride intake and a range of adverse health effects, including bone fractures, thyroid dysfunction, and neurodevelopmental issues. Research published in leading medical journals suggests that fluoride can accumulate in bone tissue, leading to increased fracture risk and skeletal fluorosis—a painful and debilitating condition.
The potential impact of fluoride on brain development is particularly concerning. Recent studies have found an association between fluoride exposure in utero and reduced IQ scores in children. These findings echo the need for a precautionary approach to fluoridation policies, considering the irreversible nature of cognitive development impairments.
Despite advancements in water quality science and technology, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has not significantly updated its water quality regulations for decades. This stagnation raises concerns about the adequacy of existing standards to protect public health considering emerging contaminants and new research findings.
As a result, it is imperative to question the continuation of water fluoridation programs. The principle of “do no harm” must guide public health policies. With alternative dental health strategies available, including improved access to dental care and the use of fluoride toothpaste, the risks associated with water fluoridation are unnecessary and avoidable.
It is time for policymakers to prioritize the health and well-being of the public by reevaluating the safety and efficacy of water fluoridation.
Residents can discover what’s truly in your tap water by visiting the Tap Water Database on Environmental Working Group’s website at EWG.org and simply entering your zip code. Empower yourselves with knowledge and take the first step towards safer, cleaner water.
Sincerely,
Andina Barone
Mindful Media Group
New York City
