Judge dismisses STAMP sewer lawsuit; Orleans will appeal

By Tom Rivers, Editor Posted 7 March 2024 at 2:07 pm

‘The fight here is not over. We have several more paths to prevent Orleans County from becoming a dumping ground for STAMP sewer discharges.’

File photo by Tom Rivers: A sewer line is shown on Aug. 12 on Route 63 in the Town of Alabama. Genesee County Economic Development Center is trying to install the sewer main along 9.5 miles of Route 63 – from the STAMP site to Oak Orchard Creek. Construction was halted before the sewer line made it to Orleans after a lawsuit was filed.

ALBION – A State Supreme Court justice today dismissed a lawsuit and temporary injunction against construction of a nearly 10-mile-long sewer main from the STAMP manufacturing site in the Town of Alabama along Route 63 to the Oak orchard Creek in the Town of Shelby.

Judge Frank Caruso ruled in favor of the Genesee County Economic Development Center, which argued Orleans County had 23 chances to state its objection to the sewer main since 2016 but waited until construction started to voice its opposition.

Judge Caruso citing the legal argument of “laches,” where there is a lack of diligence in making a legal claim. Waiting until construction commenced on the project should be seen as an unreasonable delay, attorneys for GCEDC argued in court today.

The judge also ruled in favor of GCEDC due to a statue of limitations. He made his decision from the bench in court today, following about an hour of arguments in the main courtroom of the county courthouse. He will also issue a written decision.

Orleans County officials say the county will appeal the decision, and has other court options to try to halt the project.

“The fight here is not over,”  said Alex Eaton, an attorney for the Orleans County Legislature. “We have several more paths to prevent Orleans County from becoming a dumping ground for STAMP sewer discharges.”

The county also has a lawsuit that will be heard in April about GCEDC using eminent domain to take easements in Orleans County. The attorneys for Orleans said another county’s IDA can’t do eminent domain in another county.

Orleans also supports the Tonawanda Seneca Nation in its litigation against several federal entities regarding permitting of the sewer pipeline.

“Orleans County leadership remains steadfast in our opposition to anything that puts Oak Orchard Creek in jeopardy,” Eaton, an attorney with Lippes Mathias, said in a statement released from the County Legislature. “The county and its residents rely on the creek for water, recreation and tourism, and that is why we will continue to protect the interests of our community.   Again, while we are disappointed in today’s result, there is a long way to go before this issue is settled.”

Orleans County filed its lawsuit on Sept. 11, naming GCEDC, G. DeVincentis & Son Construction Co., Inc., Genesee Gateway Local Development Corporation, and STAMP Sewer Works, Inc.

Matthew J. Fitzgerald and James O’Connor of Phillips Lytle LLP appeared in court today on behalf of GCEDC. They contended the sewer main went through a rigorous environmental review of 9,200-plus pages and ultimately was approved by the state Department of Environmental Conservation, Army Corps of Engineers and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Those agencies found no evidence of harm to Oak Orchard Creek or the community, the attorneys said.

The sewer main would allow businesses at the 1,250-acre STAMP to discharge treated sewer water into the Oak Orchard. At STAMP’s peak, the sewer main could discharge up to 6 million gallons a day in the Oak Orchard. The sewer main is imperative for economic development to move forward at the site.

“STAMP does not survive without somewhere to discharge the treated sanitary water,” Fitzgerald said in court today.

The 4-month statute of limitations passed after the Article 78 was filed by Orleans on Sept. 11, and the county failed to note other parties that would be hurt if the lawsuit was successful in halting the sewer main, Fitzgerald said.

Property owners paid for easements for the temporary construction could lose out on payments, he said. The Town of Alabama would miss out on 100,000 gallons of sewer capacity, and Niagara County Water District would miss out on selling water to the STAMP site. Orleans didn’t factor in those impacts in the lawsuit, Fitzgerald said.

The crux of the case, he said, was the contention that Orleans never gave its support for an economic development from another county. But he said Orleans officials were notified in 2016, 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023 to voice any concerns over STAMP, and GCEDC serving as lead agency.

“The response was silence,” Fitzgerald said. “They slept on their rights for approximately eight years. They could have objected.”

STAMP has about $100 million in public funds committed to developing the site so far, with about $1 billion already spend or committed in private investment, he said.

Attorneys for Orleans contend that Genesee County used its money through its industrial development agency to fund the sewer main and pursue eminent domain in another county, powers that an IDA does not have.

Jennifer Persico, an attorney with Lippes Mathias representing Orleans, said the STAMP sewer project clearly used Genesee County funds to move the project into Orleans County.

The GCEDC attorneys said the project was funded through state grants and wasn’t actually GCEDC money.

The Town of Shelby also joined Orleans in the lawsuit. The Shelby attorney, Jeffrey Allen, said Shelby supports the Orleans County efforts to halt the pipeline before it gets into Orleans. He said there are many violations of general municipal law with the project.

Shelby gave its support for the project previously, but that was a statement considering the environmental impacts of the project, he said.

“The consent was not that they could run roughshod over the autonomy of Orleans County,” Allen said in court.

The case could be a landmark for the state, said Eaton, an attorney for Orleans County. The courts should protect smaller neighboring counties from being forced to take on negative impacts from another county’s economic development efforts, he said.

“This would be one of the biggest expansions of IDA power in New York State,” Eaton said.