Anti-Trump writers don’t offer much in praise for Harris

Editor:

As a freelance writer, I often find myself going down the rabbit hole. The one that nobody else wants to bother with or talk about.

I am very aware how many people feel about Donald Trump. Many reasons have been cited, and no one seems to hold back the abundance of ammunition pointed at this man.

As I reread everyone’s comments, there was not one writer who explained why Kamala Harris would be the best choice for America. I find that very interesting and somewhat odd- that they would bring forth everything bad about Trump but nothing good about Harris.

This made me wonder why. Are people tending to lean toward a candidate, with a broken track record, because they hate Trump so much? To sacrifice better judgement at all costs to elect someone who displays no standard of excellence?

As many of you know, I attempted to explain her lack of productivity and was accused of not shedding light on Trump’s record. Perhaps I expect the same in return.

Where is the evidence or timeline of exemplary accomplishments for Harris? What makes her the better candidate? Why have no writers on this platform illustrated her proficiency?

There is an obvious imbalance between the overload of negativity toward Trump and the noticeable scarcity of positivity toward Harris.

Questions such as these make me go down the rabbit hole. I might not like what I find, but I usually get my answers.

Mary Mager

Fairport, formerly of Albion