We appreciate input from our readers, and we publish letters to the editor without charge. The letters should be written by the person who submits the letter and not be “ghost written” by someone else. While open speech and responsibility are encouraged, comments may be rejected if they are purely a personal attack, offensive or repetitive. Comments are the opinions of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Orleans Hub. Although care is taken to moderate comments, we have no control over how they are interpreted and we are unable to guarantee the accuracy of comments and the rationality of the opinions expressed. We reserve the right to edit letters for content and brevity. Please limit the length of your letter (we suggest no more than 500 words) and provide your name, telephone number, mailing address and a verifiable email address for verification purposes. Letters should be emailed to news@orleanshub.com.

Editor:

I decided to come forward after reading the Union-Sun & Journal on April 30 with the article “Chickens may come home to roost in the city.” The City of Lockport’s code revision will allow homeowners to keep up to 6 hens without a permit.

I took an interest in modern homesteading during Covid and the health benefits of growing my own food. I was recently contacted by the Village of Lyndonville’s Code Enforcement Officer to get rid of my heritage flock of rare breed chickens. I asked who complained….no one.

I have had chickens on my property for 7 years without any neighbor complaints. My daughter’s former 4-H project turned into a valuable sustainable food source for my family, especially during Covid with food supply shortages and in times of fluctuating egg prices.

My hens were contained, not free ranging. There was no smell, no roosters, no roadside egg stand. Of course, since “the law has been on the books for a long time,” nothing else mattered. I relocated the chickens before the deadline. I do not anticipate being levied the $1,000 a day fine or serving the threatened year of imprisonment. I know Lyndonville is not alone in its antiquated poultry policies. Other local municipalities in Orleans County do not allow chickens which is quite shameful in a county that prides itself on a robust agricultural industry.

93 percent of cities in the US allow chickens, including New York City, Buffalo, Rochester, Syracuse and Albany. The Village of Lyndonville, with a population of about 800 people, does not. Why? What was the reason behind banning chickens within a community of one square mile? What is the relevance now?

Raising chickens is work. Not everyone will want to it. If there are others within the Village interested in a backyard flock, please reach out to me. I have been a civil servant for 23 years in the criminal justice system. I have a B.S. degree with college coursework in Pastured Poultry, Agricultural Law and Sustainable Food & Farming.

I value the importance of standing up for what I believe in, preserving agriculture in my community and the right to grow my own food. I am not afraid to get my hands dirty and would be happy to work together to change the local law by raising awareness about the many benefits of raising a backyard flock of chickens.

Kate Hardner

Lyndonville

Editor:

I recently completed twenty-year District of Columbia metropolitan police officer Michael Fanone’s book. “Hold the Line: The Insurrection and One Cop’s Battle for America’s Soul.”

As someone who thinks truth matters, I strongly suspect that anyone who believes the January 6, 2021 attempted storming of the House of Representatives chamber by a violent mob was a lovefest isn’t fully aware of what happened that day.

Joe Biden’s predecessor continues to maintain that Fanone and dozens of others who suffered serious consequences while attempting to keep the certification of Biden as our 46th President orderly and peaceful are at the very least greatly exaggerating. (Fanone was pulled into the mob, viciously beaten and tased until he had a heart attack.)

Those still unable to accept the 2020 election results and the facts about number 45 and January 6th, 2021after reading streetwise cop Fanone’s book may need to take a closer look at this nation, our recent history, the Constitution, and the intent of—and risks taken by—patriots such as the Founding Fathers.

Sincerely,

Gary Kent

Albion

Editor:

Truth or consequences?

Orleans County voters – you have an important issue to address. Your County Legislators have put forth the proposition that your right to have local courts, the courts closest to the people, and your vote for locally elected public officers, should be taken away and ceded to New York State.

The path to the hearing on this proposed local law on May 7th has been paved with misinformation and half-truths. As the saying goes, if we fail to understand the truth, we are destined to suffer the consequences.

By Resolution 137-323 of the Orleans County Legislature, an 11-member “District Court Committee” was established. Its directive: to “study the potential implementation of a district court system in Orleans County…. and to provide a recommendation to the County Legislature regarding the merits of the establishment of a district court system.”

The report of the committee starts with the conclusion that a district court is the best option for Orleans County. It then provides anecdotal statements from the New York State Bar Association in an attempt to support that conclusion. Almost half of the committee, 5 of the 11 members, have either dissented from the recommendation or abstained from making any recommendation whatsoever. Hardly a ringing endorsement of the current plan.

Where are the facts to support making such a drastic change? Why can’t they provide definitive financial information? Where is the necessary support from the State Legislature for funding?

The crux of the committee’s report suggests substantial cost savings by substituting individual town courts for a single district court. At the same time, they admit that a vote to establish a district court does not terminate existing Town Courts (New York State Constitution (Article VI, Section 17). Towns would still need to fund local courts. So where is the promised cost savings?

The report includes a statement almost too cynical to be believed: “…. townships can minimize the cost of the justice court by substantially reducing the court’s budget, salaries and personnel and other resources to render the justice court ineffective and essentially exist in name only.” It is unconscionable that a Legislative body would accept a plan to “render the justice court ineffective.” Does this sound like a committee seeking to “improve safety, fairness, access to justice and efficiency in the administration of criminal justice”?

Our founders established three separate yet equal branches of government in the Constitution – Legislative, Executive and Judicial. Each branch is to have separate and independent powers, so that no one branch is more powerful than another.

It should not be the goal of a County Legislature to run roughshod over the Judicial branch to “render justice courts ineffective.” No one branch should have that power over another.  That is autocracy not democracy.

Please do not let the County Legislature take away your access to local courts and your right to vote for community representation. Your decision has consequences.

Hon. Sherry R. Davenport

Past President of the New York State Magistrates Association

Cortland