Lyndonville ready for school budget revote on June 16
District says budget with 2.5% tax increase keeps up with inflation, provides students with opportunities

Photos by Tom Rivers: Dan Dragula, Lyndonville’s school business administrator, goes over the district’s 2026-27 budget which goes for a revote on June 16. Dragula said cost-of-living increases and inflation require a tax increase of 2.5 percent, which he said is below the 4.0 percent for the district’s tax cap.
LYNDONVILLE – The school district will try again on June 16 with a public vote on the 2026-27 school district budget.
The district is presenting the same spending plan that was voted down on May 19 – with 172 opposed and 129 votes in favor. The voting on June 16 will be from noon to 8 p.m. in the Stroyan Auditorium Foyer.
The $19,194,000 budget would increase spending by 9.8 percent or by $1,719,670 from the $17,474,330 in 2025-26. However, most of that increase is driven by a capital project which is funded by the state, said Dan Dragula, the school’s business administrator.
The tax levy would increase by 2.5 percent from $4,758,692 to $4,877,659. The budget with a 2.5 percent tax increase is already below the district’s allowable tax cap of 4.0 percent.
If the budget is voted down again, Lyndonville would have to adopt a contingency budget would mean reducing spending by another $266,495 to get the budget to $18,927,505.

Bill Jurinich, a former Board of Education member, said the district should have reduced some costs from the budget that was voted down by the community on May 19 with 172 opposed and 129 votes in favor. The budget presented on June 16 is the same as the one on May 19. Jurinich said the steady tax increases over the years has made it unaffordable for many in the community, especially senior citizens on fixed incomes.
Some community members want the district to reduce spending in the budget revote. Bill Jurinich, a former board member for nine years, attended a Tuesday evening meeting on the budget.
He told the school officials they should have made some more cuts after the budget was defeated. However, he said even a 1 percent increase would likely be voted down by the public.
“People are tired,” he said. “It’s been one increase after another.”
He also questioned some of the capital project expenditures, even if the state is footing the bill. Lyndonville put in a new synthetic track as part of the current capital project.
“We need that track like a hole in the head,” Jurinich told Dragula in the school’s foyer.
Jeanne Crane spoke during the public comment opportunity at the Board of Education meeting. She acknowledged she is a senior citizen at age 86.
She said the Lyndonville district provided a great education for seven of her grandchildren, who have all graduated. She said the 2.5 percent tax increase would raise her taxes by $60, which she said doesn’t buy a tank of gas and barely covers two meals out in a restaurant.
“I’m speaking from the heart,” Crane said. “Every penny we spend on a child is worth it. Our children are our future.”
Dragula, in a budget presentation, said the district is facing cost of living increases, including $116,745 more for gas, electric, water and diesel. Lyndonville needs to pay $102,820 more for contributions to Social Security and pensions.
There is also a 2023 capital project loan payment of $888,678 which is funded by state, but makes the district’s expenditures jump significantly.
Lyndonville has been paring costs, Dragula said, well before the 2026-27 budget was presented to the public. He said the district didn’t replace three retired teachers in math, English and tech which reduced spending by $280,000. Lyndonville also ended a special education pre-K program with one teacher and three aides, reducing expenses by $132,000.
The school budget is a statement of values, Dragula said.
“We value quality education where students have more than the minimum required opportunities,” he said. “We support the arts, athletics and technology beyond the state minimum. We offer electives and college courses to offer more exposure and learning.”
The district acknowledged concern by some in the community over reassessments that have resulted in some people paying more in taxes.
The district includes the town of Yates (taxable value of $244.7 million) and portions of Carlton ($107.5 million), Ridgeway ($55.1 million) and Gaines ($2.4 million).
The towns have assessors that determine the assessments. The school district is not involved in that process. Just because the assessed values are up, Dragula said the district isn’t seeking a big tax increase.
The tax levy is distributed through the overall tax base. The reassessments can shift what different properties are billed at, but the overall tax levy is proposed to increase by 2.5 percent.
For more on the budget revote, click here to be directed to the school district’s website.



































