Barre votes to dissolve Water District 10, saying costs too high
Some residents say their groundwater is in short supply and not healthy for drinking

Photos by Tom Rivers: Barre Town Supervisor Steve Coville said the current financial implications are far too high for the property owners in Water District No. 10 for the district to move forward.
BARRE – The Town Board is dissolving Water District No.10 after the costs for constructing the district more than doubled from when the district was initially formed in 2019.
The town has been unable to secure enough in grant funding to bring down the costs to an affordable level for the 37 chargeable units in the district, town officials said during a public hearing on Wednesday. Water District 10 covers 23,350 linear feet or about 4 1/2 miles on Angevine, McNamar and Transit roads.
The Town Board intends to look at a larger district, including other parts of town without public water access. That would give Barre a better chance at more grant funding to help pay for the project, said Town Supervisor Steve Coville.
The board held a public hearing on Wednesday about the district’s dissolution. Some residents said the annual debt service of approximately $3,133 was far too high.
But other residents said they are desperate with water wells that often run low or yield poor-quality water.

Richard Edman tells the Town Board he brought the first petition to town officials, trying to get public water for Water District 10. He is concerned the well water is putting many peoples’ health at risk.
Richard Edman of Transit Road said safe drinking water for residents should be top priority. He worries the poor quality water is ruining peoples’ health.
Brandon and Liz Gurnsey of Angevine Road said their well has often run dry. They have two children under age 3. They said they want to stay in barre to raise their family, but the lack of public water access has been very challenging.
“You’re putting people in an impossible situation,” Mr. Gurnsey said.
Coville, the town supervisor, said the costs are too much for the 37 equivalent dwelling units in the district. When the district was formed in 2019, the construction costs was estimated at $1 1. million with annual debt payment for each EDU at $508.16 per unit, plus about $300 annually for water use with another $60 maintenance fee.
But the construction costs skyrocketed after the Covid pandemic in 2020 and the cost of materials and construction have continued to rise, Coville said.
The total cost of the district is now at $2.7 million. That puts the debt service over 38 years for each EDU at $3,133.80 annually, plus water costing at least $345 a year with the $60 maintenance fee.
“That is an astronomical cost,” one resident at the hearing. “We don’t support that.”
Barre was approved for $616,600 in grants when the project was closer to the $1.1 million cost. Barre has twice applied for $1,624,800 state grants through the Water Infrastructure Improvement (WIIA) program, but has been denied.
“We want to help,” Coville told about a dozen residents at Wednesday’s public hearing. “We’ve done everything we possibly could. The numbers are just too big.”

Kirk Mathes, Wes Miller, Margaret Swan, David Allen and Town Supervisor Steve Coville voted unanimously to dissolve Water District 10 and will instead try a bigger district that they said would have a better chance for grants.
Town officials said they tried to partner with Clarendon for a joint project that would have covered Water District 10 and part of Clarendon, but the Monroe County Water Authority denied having MCWA water go into Barre. The MCWA provides water in Clarendon while the Village of Albion provides Barre with water. The MCWA avoids out-of-district connections.
The Gurnseys on Angevine Road wondered if the Town of Barre Highway Department could provide the labor and install the district. But Coville said the department has other duties including patching roads, and Dale Brooks, the highway superintendent, said the department shouldn’t devote so much time to a water district, rather than a project benefitting the entire town.
The highway crew did put in a small waterline with hydrants on Eagle Harbor Road to close a dead-end main. Those materials were paid for with federal funds from the American Rescue Plan Act. Those ARPA federal funds were awarded by the federal government. Brooks said highway departments in the county have done the smaller projects through ARPA, but the larger water districts are done by contractors through the public bidding process.
Coville said Barre will discuss options for a new water district with its engineer. He said the town has already spent $129,293 towards Water District 10. The engineering and some of that work can still be used as the town looks at a larger district.
“It’s not like we’ve been sitting back,” Councilman Kirk Mathes said. “There’s not enough houses to get the costs down.”























