Editor:

Tomorrow the village of Albion will vote for a new mayor and two trustees. I hope this election is decided by more than the approximately 200 to 400 people who always vote in each election. Some thoughts on the candidates:

Some say they have past experience on the board, however, previous administrations did a very poor job of planning for the future. They seemed to concentrate only on keeping the tax rate under the tax cap. This led to poor budget planning and no planning for future needs.  We now find ourselves faced with higher water/sewer rates because of this lack of foresight. Kicking the can down the road does not help the village prepare for the future.

This lack of planning also led to the issue with the Albion police department. The correction attempted by the new board was not a “defund the police” issue but an issue of incorrect pay accounting by a previous administration. See Orleans Hub, July 18, 2022 article for complete explanation.

Now the two candidates for mayor, as well as the trustees, must contend with increasing the tax rate to bring the village back to a budget that includes planning for the future in a responsible, proactive manner.

Joyce Riley is the kind of mayor that Albion needs to get this job done. Joyce is not afraid of doing what is right and best for the village and its residents. She is not afraid to speak her mind on issues. The people of this village needs someone who is honest, straightforward and willing to do the hard work it will take to bring Albion back to the vital, vibrant community it once was.

Please vote for Joyce Riley for mayor and let her continue her good works for Albion.  Remember to get out and vote tomorrow, March 18th, from 12 p.m. to 9 p.m. at the Albion Village Hall, 35-37 Main St.

Sandra Walter

Albion

Editor:

Genesee County has long struggled with water problems, including contaminated and insufficient groundwater and devastating droughts in 2023 and 2025. Despite piping water in through the massive, expensive Genesee County Water Supply Project, we still suffer persistent water scarcity. People in Pembroke and Bethany have dealt with dry taps in the past two years.

Yet the Genesee County Economic Development Center (GCEDC) is considering a proposal for a hulking data center the size of eleven Walmart Supercenters in our rural Town of Alabama. This monster would be built at the STAMP (Science and Technology Advanced Manufacturing Park) failing boondoggle, harming local public protected lands and the Tonawanda Seneca Nation’s territory with its noise and pollution.

The GCEDC will tell you the data center would use “only” 20,000 gallons of water per day. They will also tell you that it is needed to solve the County’s water problems– that data center proceeds will help fund the infrastructure needed to bring up to 10 million gallons of water per day to the County from Lake Ontario via the Monroe County Water Authority.

This nonsensical plan would hinge our water “solutions” to multinational corporations and their financial backers who have no care or concern whatsoever for Genesee County and its people. And we’d have to accept all the data center’s unacceptable energy, environmental, and aesthetic impacts.

There are other ways to fund water infrastructure that don’t hold Genesee County hostage to GCEDC and its for-profit tenants: for example, the Drinking Water State Revolving Fund. Giving billions in tax breaks to a data center in order to generate far less for our water problems is dangerously short-sighted: taxpayers and local governments will be on the hook to maintain this infrastructure forever, long past the data center lifespan (10-15 years) and even the length of the proposed 30-year PILOT (Payment-In-Lieu-of-Taxes) agreement.

And how helpful will the data center be if it opens pipes to future thirsty industrial tenants at STAMP? Genesee County has already committed 200,000 gallons of water per day to STAMP, and claims this will have “no adverse impact.” But this would be 200,000 gallons going daily to STAMP instead of to people, households, and farms.

Who loses here? People suffering from water crises–the same people who will foot the big bills for much of this boondoggle. The $1.4 billion in taxpayer subsidies sought for the data center would dwarf what it ever would contribute to water infrastructure.

GCEDC also wants you to believe that agriculture and food industries are the real water gluttons in Genesee County, not data centers. Yet agriculture has long been top-priority for our economy and way of life. It’s simply unjustifiable to use any water for data centers, AI, and future far-flung STAMP Big Tech and multinational corporation tenants – instead of for people and food.

For all its massive demands and impacts, this data center would provide only 125 jobs –likely to include non-local construction laborers, given GCEDC’s history of local labor waivers. The per job public cost for each job? A shocking $11.4 million. GCEDC once promised that STAMP would create 9,000 advanced manufacturing jobs. An AI data center does the polar opposite: it would provide a pitiful number of jobs while guzzling 410,000 homes’ worth of electricity every year, and generate nothing of social value. This is more proof that STAMP is failing: that the site is untenable; and that GCEDC is desperate.

So, who wins? US STREAM Data Centers, financial backer Apollo Global Management (one of the world’s largest private equity firms, with ties to the Epstein Files), and the data center operator – a Big Tech company whose identity is secret thanks to a non-disclosure agreement. And GCEDC, which would make a sweet $145.9 million in fees from the deal.

We cannot allow any water to be siphoned away by developments like data centers, or be fooled by the GCEDC’s claims that a data center will solve our water problems. We call on Monroe County residents to oppose the data center, since Monroe County Water Authority supply and infrastructure would be tapped for STAMP. We encourage residents of Genesee County and Monroe County to weigh in on this plan: there is a legally required public hearing this Thursday, March 19 at 7 p.m. at the Town of Alabama Fire Hall, and GCEDC is accepting written comments through March 31.

A mega data center complex is the polar opposite of a “savior” for the physical and financial realities of our dire water situation. It would hurt our rural and agricultural communities, and be a deep, deep injustice to the next-door Tonawanda Seneca Nation. And it is being leveraged to attract even more resource-sucking development to STAMP.

RaeAnn Engler

Batavia

Christine Zinni, Ph.D

Batavia

Evan Lowenstein, MUP

Rochester

Editor:

I don’t usually comment on the race for Mayor, and unlike some others, I’ve always preferred to keep a low profile on issues involving the Village. Many of you know me from my years teaching high school science at Medina High School and coaching baseball. One thing I always tried to instill in my students was that their voices matter. At a time like this, I feel it’s important that I use mine.

Marguerite and I have shared a life together for many years, and long before she ever held public office, I saw the kind of person she is. From the start of her career in education, she has always gone above and beyond to make sure things are done the right way and that people are treated the right way.

When the cheerleading team didn’t have a coach and it looked like the girls might lose their season, Marguerite stepped in to coach because she couldn’t stand the thought of those students missing out. She also took on class advisor roles so students would have someone guiding and supporting them.

Throughout her teaching career, both as a teacher and later as a department chair, she fought for special education students and their families. She believed deeply that those students deserved every service and opportunity available to them, and she worked hard to make sure they received it.

That same sense of responsibility is what led her into public service. Her involvement began on the Planning Board, where she spent years helping guide thoughtful decisions about our community. Following that, she continued serving Medina as a trustee and now as mayor, always focused on moving the village forward.

All of this happened while we were raising four children. She was there for band and chorus concerts, YMCA sports, Scouts, and high school athletics. Today she brings that same love and energy to being a grandmother.

We chose to buy our home in the Village of Medina 26 years ago because it was where we wanted to raise our family. Medina had everything we hoped for – great schools, a paid fire department and police force, and a walkable community with shops and restaurants nearby. It was a wonderful place to raise our kids, and in many ways it has only gotten better.

Elections can sometimes bring out the worst in people. I’ve read some of the comments and accusations, and they don’t solve the challenges Medina faces. What I know is this: Medina means the world to Marguerite. She has given countless hours of her time to this community because she truly cares about the people who live here.

I’m proud of the work she’s done, and proud to stand beside her as she continues working for the Village of Medina.

Sincerely,

Marguerite’s husband

Jon Sherman

Medina

Editor:

To the residents of the Village of Medina, the village needs a Mayor who is a good leader.  The Mayor is the Chief Executive Officer.  The Mayor represents the directives of the majority vote of the remaining four Board of Trustees.

The Mayor has no authority over the other four Board members other than their authority to supervise the police and other subordinate officers.

A good leader needs the respect of all members of their team and of those which they supervise in order for there to be progress. Respect is earned when respect is given. A good leader is honest and transparent. A good leader recognizes the strengths of the members of their team and uses those strengths towards the achievement of the goal.

The last two years have unfortunately spiraled into chaos and dissention on our Village Board. Leadership skills on many fronts have been severely lacking. Differences of opinion have resulted in a debilitating absence of transparency on the Board. Focus on one loud, disrespectful department has prevented much needed attention on other departments.  Our Village has suffered.

I was not raised to point fingers of blame or toot my own horn. I had also not intended to be running for the position of Mayor. But I see the direction of this Village, financially and quite frankly, ethically, and I cannot sit idly by.

I do not have all of the fancy words to promise all of the wonderful things I plan to do for this Village. I will say that my lifetime of experience in Village government is actually unparalleled. My experience working with budgets and finances should be a huge asset to our Village Board. My leadership skills will hopefully provide an example to follow. I will be honest and transparent and recognize the skills and experiences of others to move this Village forward.

If you elect me Mayor, I will not do this alone. I will include my fellow board members, department heads, committee members, community leaders and hopefully surrounding elected officials to make Medina a comfortable, affordable place to live. We all love Medina. Please take advantage of this turning point in our Village. I would appreciate your support. Thank you!

Please vote Padoleski, Prawel and Wagner on March 18, 2026!

Deborah Padoleski

Candidate for Mayor in Village of Medina

Editor:

Things Joyce Riley has left off her accomplishments list:

Approximate Result of attempted Police Defunding: $7,500 to PBA attorney, $30,500-plus in village attorney fees, and $20,000-plus for auditor, plus monies resulting from back pay due to the unauthorized and illegal pay change.

Three police officers quit with one as a direct result of the defund attempt and another two resulting from fear of no growth (loss of SRO because of inability to work with school on negotiating) or further hostilities from the board.

The water plant operator and an employee quit as a result of verbal berating and constant micro managing including comments to the effect of “they knew what the job was and if they don’t like it then they can leave.”

Several personal harassment and other investigations.

Pricing a not-for-profit out of a rental unit then saying good luck finding a new place cheaper than what we’re offering. And ridiculing other board members when attempting to correct the situation. And the rental unit is still empty, costing the village to continue on missing out on income.

Constant rhetoric of just cutting services and leaving them fall to the county with zero concern about their budget or impact on county-wide constituents.

Overly aggressive communication to the point where unless you agree you’re wrong.

We don’t need to continue with those accomplishments.

Please get out and vote for Tim McMurray on March 18th for mayor.

Geno Allport

Albion